Gender Stereotypes in Boyd Smith’s the Story of Pocahontas and Captain John Smith: A Greimas’ Actantial Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v17i1.8574Keywords:
gender stereotypes, actantial model, feminist perspectiveAbstract
The research attempted to examine the contribution and relevance of structuralism as a theory, method, and paradigm, especially in the study of feminist literary criticism in the novel entitled The Story of Pocahontas and Captain John Smith. Many researchers had scrutinized the novel from various approaches, such as socio-cultural, historical political, and post-colonial studies. However, analysis using actantial models had not been conducted and reported in scholarly journals. The qualitative research utilized textual analysis that practiced a narrative semiotic approach proposed by Greimas. The research used the actantial model proposed by Greimas to evaluate the narrative’s deep structure so as to reveal gender stereotypes of male and female characters in the novel, written in 1906. Although the female character appeared as the main character, she was portrayed as sentimental, emotional, weak, and dependent on the male characters’ help. In contrast, the male characters were shown as dominant figures. They were portrayed as physically strong, rational, thoughtful, and able to prioritize the interests of the wider community and independently achieve the goals they wanted. It is found that the discussion about gender stereotypes in literary works is still relevant to be carried out, especially in literary works, because several kinds of research showcase that the portrayal of stereotyped characters has an unfavorable impact on children’s cognitive and affective development.
Plum Analytics
References
Aryangga, A., & Nurmaily, E. (2017). Women’s power and stereotype denial in Pocahontas movie. Teknosastik, 15(1), 46-60. https://dx.doi.org/10.33365/ts.v15i1.19.
Braden, E. G., & Rodriguez, S. C. (2016). Beyond mirrors and windows: A critical content analysis of Latinx children’s books. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 12(2), 56-83.
Casey, K., Novick, K., & Lourenco, S. F. (2021). Sixty years of gender representation in children’s books: Conditions associated with overrepresentation of male versus female protagonists. PLoS ONE, 16(12), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260566.
Delap, L. (2018). Feminism, masculinities, and emotional politics in late twentieth century Britain. Cultural and Social History, 15(4), 571-593. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780038.2018.1518560.
Dzikriya, U. (2019). Analysis of actantial model in Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games. Rainbow: Journal of Literature, Linguistics and Cultural Studies, 8(2), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.15294/rainbow.v8i2.34207.
Eldridge, S. (2017). Hero or anti-hero? Narratives of newswork and journalistic identity construction in complex digital megastories. Digital Journalism, 5(2), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1162105.
Filipović, K. (2018). Gender representation in children’s books: Case of an early childhood setting. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 32(3), 310-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2018.1464086.
Fitriani, L., & Muassomah, M. (2021). Gender inequality within a family: The representation of women’s novel in social media. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra, 16(1), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v16i1.10681.
Fowler, M. D. (2020). From actantial model to conceptual graph: Thematized action in John Cage’s 0′00′(4′33′′No. 2). Journal of Mathematics and Music, 14(3), 307-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459737.2020.1760953.
Gorsevski, E. W. (2018). Native America persists: Pocahontas versus Trump. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 13(2), 160-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2018.1493112.
Greimas, A. J. (1987). On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Greimas, A. J., & Courtes, J. (1982). Semiotics and language (M. R. L., Crist, D. Patte, J. Lee, E. McMahon II, G. Phillips, Eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Kim, S., & Lee, Y. (2018). Why do women want to be beautiful? A qualitative study proposing a new “human beauty values” concept. PLoS ONE, 13(8), e0201347. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201347.
Kneeskern, E. E., & Reeder, P. A. (2020). Examining the impact of fiction literature on children’s gender stereotypes. Current Psychology, 41, 1472-1485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00686-4.
Martin, R. (2017). Gender and emotion stereotypes in children’s television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 61(3), 499-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2017.1344667.
Rahmadewi, A., & Supriyadi, S. (2021). Character value in the story of Bawang Merah Bawang Putih and their relevance for strengthening character of elementary school students. Academia Open, 6, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.6.2022.2345.
Rubegni, E., Landoni, M., De Angeli, A., & Jaccheri, L. (2019). Detecting gender stereotypes in children digital storytelling. Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC 2019, 386-393. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3323156.
Seitz, M., Lenhart, J., & Rübsam, N. (2020). The effects of gendered information in stories on preschool children’s development of gender stereotypes. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 38(3), 363-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12323.
Senjuti, T. T. (2022). The role of patriarchy and gender stereotyping in children’s books: With reference to Harry Potter and The Chronicles of Narnia. Journal of English Literature and Cultural Studies, 2(4), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.26655/JELCS.2021.4.4.
Smith, B. (1906). The story of Pocahontas and Captain John Smith. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Webb, A. (2019). Actantial insights: Making sense of sport for development performance account management. Journal of Global Sport Management, 7(2), 327-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/24704067.2019.1669064.
Wood, C. (2017). “Pocahontas: Propaganda, legend, hope”, and “Noble Avatars: The Outlaw Meets the Savage”. Quest, 189, 25-34.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Supiastutik Supiastutik, Dyah Purwita WSWW, Olivia Putri Citra Ramadani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)