Language Documentation Practices in Indonesia: A Critical Theory Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v18i1.11878Keywords:
critical theory, language documentation, descriptive linguistics, natural language recording, Indonesia academiaAbstract
The research examined the potential of language documentation practices in Indonesia. Using principles from critical theory, it argued that language documentation was different from language description, which was classified as monodisciplinary linguistics. Rather, language documentation had a broad scope of potential uses beyond descriptive linguistics. This was because language documentation could be linked to other linguistics fields such as sociolinguistics, oral tradition, oral history, and others. The core of language documentation was the natural language recordings that can be used in various fields, making language documentation part of interdisciplinary linguistics. Besides, multiple national and international institutions recognized its value. Meanwhile, language documentation in Indonesia was still closely linked to traditional descriptive or theoretical linguistics and was considered a data collection process rather than an independent field in linguistics. Furthermore, natural language recordings were still considered unscientific by the Indonesian academic community, especially in linguistics fields. This was because natural language recording could not be a final project for linguistics students or an output of linguistics research in Indonesia. Research output was still limited to products such as dictionaries, teaching materials, grammar, language maps, and so on. The research used a descriptive qualitative approach. Data collection included close reading books, journals, and other relevant academic materials. Therefore, the research argues that natural language recordings should be considered a valid scientific activity as a final project for linguistics students or the output of linguistic research in Indonesia. Thus, the number of natural language recordings in Indonesia will increase in national and international repositories. In fact, this can contribute to linguistic research because many linguistics scholars can utilize these language documentation results.
Plum Analytics
References
Akpan, A., Urua, E.-A., & Ekpenyong, M. (2018). Bridging the gap between language documentation and description for effective linguistic research. Journal of the Linguistics Association of Nigeria, 3, 9-20.
Amith, J. (2020). Endangered language documentation: The challenges of interdisciplinary research in ethnobiology. Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language Documentation, 21, 72-112.
Balukh, J. (2021). A grammar of Dhao; An endangered Austronesian language in Eastern Indonesia. Wacana, 22(2), 522-533. https://doi.org/10.17510/wacana.v22i2.1005.
Chelliah, S. L. (2021). Why language documentation matters. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66190-8
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Resign design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods research. In Introducing English Language (Fifth Edit). Singapore: Sage Publications.
Danerek, S. (2018). Documentation of Palu’e; Storytelling and folklore. Wacana: Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia, 18(3), 718-745. https://doi.org/10.17510/wacana.v18i3.634.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791.
Dash, N. S. (2024) Documentation and digitization of endangered indigenous languages: Methods and strategies. Proceedings of the International Mother Language Day 2024. Colombo, Sri Lanka. pp. 5-24.
Directorate General of Higher Education (Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi). (2020). Buku panduan merdeka belajar Kampus Merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. https://dikti.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Buku-Panduan-Merdeka-Belajar-Kampus-Merdeka-2020-1.pdf.
Erniati, N. (2020). Sistem fonologi bahasa Melayu dialek Ambon. BEBASAN Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan Dan Kesastraan, 6(2), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.26499/bebasan.v6i2.116.
Fitzgerald, C. M. (2021). A framework for language revitalization and documentation. Language, 97(1), e1–e11. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0006.
Freyenhagen, F. (2017). Critical theory’s philosophy. In The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology (pp. 356–378). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316344118.019.
Garing, J., Agus, N., Arisnawati, N., & Mappau, R. (2021). Sistem fonologi bahasa limola/Phonology system in limola language. Aksara, 33(1), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.29255/aksara.v33i1.671.153-168.
Handayani, R. (2019). Penyusunan sistem morfologi sebagai upaya pendokumentasian bahasa: Prefiksasi bahasa budong-budong. Sawerigading: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 25(2), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.26499/sawer.v25i2.606.
Indri, M., D. B. (2023). Filsafat ilmu bimbingan dan konseling di Indonesia: Telaah kritis teori dan praktis. Chalim Journal of Teaching and Learning (CJoTL), 1(2), 209-217. https://doi.org/10.31538/cjotl.v1i2.371.
Irwan, I., Siska, F., Zusmelia, Z., & Meldawati, M. (2022). Analisis perubahan peran dan fungsi keluarga pada masyarakat Minangkabau dalam teori feminisme dan teori kritis. Satwika: Kajian Ilmu Budaya dan Perubahan Sosial, 6(1), 191-205. https://doi.org/10.22219/satwika.v6i1.19383.
Klamer, M., & Saad, G. (2020). Reduplication in Abui: A case of pattern extension. Morphology, 30(4), 311-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-020-09369-z.
Koster, J. (2012). Theories of language from a critical perspective. In The Cambridge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 9-25). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051729.003.
Moro, F. R. (2019). Loss of morphology in Alorese (Austronesian): Simplification in adult language contact. Journal of Language Contact, 12(2), 378-403. https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-01202005.
O’Mahony, P. (2023). Introduction to special issue: The critical theory of society. European Journal of Social Theory, 26(2), 121-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310231154081.
Oliva, A., Olivia, A., & Novara, I. (2020). Marx and contemporary critical theory: The philosophy of real abstraction. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Prihartono, W. (2019). Sistem fonologi dalam bahasa nedebang. Jurnal Lingko: Jurnal Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan, 1(1), 32-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.26499/jl.v1i1.27.
Rahima, A. (2024). Language documentation as a revitalization effort regional languages are starting to extinct. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Arts, 3(3), 72-76. https://doi.org/10.47709/ijmdsa.v3i3.4123.
Republic of Indonesia. (2016). Regulations of the Head of the Indonesian Institute of Science Number 1 concerning guidelines for the selection of researchers’ fields of expertise. Jakarta, Indonesia: State Secretary.
Republic of Indonesia. (2018). Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture Number 42 of 2018 concerning national language and literature policies. Jakarta, Indonesia: State Secretary.
Rhodes, R., & Campbell, L. (2018). The goals of language documentation. In K. L. Rehg & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Endangered Languages (pp. 106-122). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190610029.013.7.
Ryen, E. (2020). Klafki’s critical-constructive didaktik and the epistemology of critical thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(2), 214-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1657959.
Sawaki, Y. W. (2019). Meneropong tipologi bahasa-bahasa di Papua: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Linguistik Indonesia, 36(2), 129-143. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v36i2.79
Schulze, I. (2015). Factorizing the sociocultural dimension of language documentation. Iran and the Caucasus, 19(4), 311-333. https://doi.org/10.1163/1573384X-20150403.
Seyfeddinipur, M., & Rau, F. (2020). Keeping it real: Video data in language documentation and language archiving. Language Documentation & Conservation, 14, 503-519.
Sholahudin, U. (2020). Membedah teori kritis mazhab Frankfurt: Sejarah, asumsi, dan kontribusinya terhadap perkembangan teori ilmu sosial. Journal of Urban Sociology, 3(2), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.30742/jus.v3i2.1246.
Varela, M. E., & Lee, N. H. (2018). Language documentation: A reference point for theatre and performance archives? International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 14(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2018.1453242.
Voelkel, S., & Kretzschmar, F. (2021). Language documentation and descriptive linguistics. In Introducing Linguistic Research (pp. 79-105). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316884485.006.
Yaniasih, Y. (2020). Teori kritis terhadap analisis sitasi untuk kajian kuantitatif sains dan evaluasi kinerja riset. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 16(1), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v16i1.72.
Zamiri, M., & Esmaeili, A. (2024). Methods and technologies for supporting knowledge sharing within learning communities: A systematic literature review. Administrative Sciences, 14(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14010017.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Satwiko Budiono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
