Adaptive Reuse of Pos Bloc and M Bloc: The Intersection of Third Place, Nostalgia, and Circular Economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v14i3.9688Keywords:
adaptive reuse, third place, nostalgia, heritage building, circular economyAbstract
The research examined the adaptive reuse strategy of heritage buildings that hold nostalgic value as commercial spaces with the third-place concept approach. The need for space facilities for urban communities continued to change based on the activities of its users. People of productive age living in big cities and the suburbs needed space for gathering and relaxation between work and homes. On the other hand, in the downtown area, several heritage buildings were still sturdy and owned by the state but were no longer used optimally or maintained. Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings was a strategy that emerged as a solution to address this need. Nostalgia contained in the preservation of cultural heritage buildings was a significant value to attract visitors and impact economic benefits. Studies were needed regarding aligning economic values with social and environmental needs in adaptive reuse. Qualitative methods with in-depth observations were carried out at two sites, namely the adaptive reuse of Pos Bloc and M Bloc Jakarta, heritage buildings gathering spaces for workers and young people of productive age. This method was applied to analyze the history of the building, the current condition of the interior, and the impact on the economy and community. The research finds that the adaptive reuse of Pos Bloc and M Bloc as third spaces by utilizing nostalgic values is a strategy to maintain cultural heritage as well as an effort to drive a circular economy.
Plum Analytics
References
Agha, M. (2019). Nubia still exists: On the utility of the nostalgic space. Humanities, 8(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/h8010024.
Arfa, F. H., Zijlstra, H., Lubelli, B., & Quist, W. (2022). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: From a literature review to a model of practice. Historic Environment: Policy and Practice, 13(2), 148-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2022.2058551.
Avdikos, V., & Kalogeresis, A. (2017). Socio-economic profile and working conditions of freelancers in co-working spaces and work collectives: Evidence from the design sector in Greece. Area, 49(1), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12279.
Bosman, C., & Dolley, J. (2019). Rethinking third places and community building. In Rethinking Third Places (pp. 1-19). UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433916.00009
Brown, J. (2017). Curating the “third place”? Coworking and the mediation of creativity. Geoforum, 82, 112-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.04.006.
Chark, R. (2021). Midnight in Paris on heritage and nostalgia. Annals of Tourism Research, 90, 103266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103266.
Chen, X., You, E. S., Lee, T. J., & Li, X. (2021). The influence of historical nostalgia on a heritage destination’s brand authenticity, brand attachment, and brand equity: Historical nostalgia on a heritage destination’s brand authenticity. International Journal of Tourism Research, 23(6), 1176-1190. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2477.
Conejos, S., Chew, M. Y. L., & Yung, E. H. K. (2017). The future adaptivity of nineteenth century heritage buildings. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 35(4), 332-347. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-03-2017-0012/FULL/XML.
Elsorady, D. A. (2018). Adaptive reuse decision making of a heritage building Antoniadis Palace, Egypt. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 14(5), 658-677. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2018.1558313.
Fajarwati, A. A. S., Hendrassukma, D., & Andangsari, E. W. (2022). Adaptive reuse the old house into restaurant: Space, nostalgic, and economic value. IEOM Society International (Proceedings of the 3rd Asia Pacific International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management). Johor Baru, Malaysia. pp 3881-3892.
Fajarwati, A. A. S., Koesoemadinata, F. H., & Sondakh, S. I. (2019). Ruang kuliner dan kelas sosial di Jakarta Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya, Universitas Indonesia. Urban: Jurnal Seni Urban, 2(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.52969/jsu.v2i1.6.
Foster, G. (2020). Circular economy strategies for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings to reduce environmental impacts. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 152, 104507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104507.
Hermawan, I., & Abrianto, O. (2020). Pola tata ruang weltevreden dan fungsi ruang kota. Panalungtik, 3(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.24164/pnk.v3i1.32.
Kusno, A. (2019). Escape from Jakarta? Current History, 118(809), 235-240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2019.118.809.235.
Levental, O. (2020). Built heritage or lost nostalgia: Israeli fans and the conservation of sports venues. Israel Affairs, 26(4), 573-588. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2020.1775938.
Li, Y., Chen, X., Tang, B. sin, & Wong, S. W. (2018). From project to policy: Adaptive reuse and urban industrial land restructuring in Guangzhou city, China. Cities, 82, 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.05.006.
Lin, Z. (CJ), Wong, I. A., Zhang, G., & Chen, Y. (2022). Longing for the heritage treasure: Reconnecting the self and the heritage site through nostalgic reminiscences and psychological ownership. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 39(3), 320-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2022.2089953.
Misirlisoy, D., & Günçe, K. (2016). Adaptive reuse strategies for heritage buildings: A holistic approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 26, 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.05.017.
Mohamed, R., Boyle, R., Yang, A. Y., & Tangari, J. (2017). Adaptive reuse: A review and analysis of its relationship to the 3 Es of sustainability. Facilities, 35(3-4), 138-154. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-12-2014-0108.
Mukhaer, A. A. (2023, February 11). M Bloc Space: Pelestarian cagar budaya dan tempat kumpul anak muda. Retrieved from https://nationalgeographic.grid.id/read/133688406/m-bloc-space-pelestarian-cagar-budaya-dan-tempat-kumpul-anak-muda?page=all.
Nguyen, T. V. T., Han, H., Sahito, N., & Lam, T. N. (2019). The bookstore-café: Emergence of a new lifestyle as a “third place” in Hangzhou, China. Space and Culture, 22(2), 216-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331218795832.
Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. UK: Marlow & Company.
Prayag, G., & del Chiappa, G. (2021). Nostalgic feelings: Motivation, positive and negative emotions, and authenticity at heritage sites. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 18(3), 349-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2021.1874000.
Purnell, D., & Breede, D. C. (2018). Traveling the third place: Conferences as third places. Space and Culture, 21(4), 512-523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331217741078.
Randy, F. (2019, November 17). M Bloc dari gudang kosong jadi tempat nongkrong. Retrieved from https://historia.id/galeri/articles/m-bloc-dari-gudang-kosong-jadi-tempat-nongkrong-6ljwo/page/1.
Rombe, O. S. C., Henry, L., Rachmayanti, I., Fajarwati, A. A. S., & Meliana, S. (2023). Gentrification and adaptive reuse: An exploration of the design concept of sustainable urban escape, case study: Pos Bloc and Pasar Baru Shopping Street, Jakarta. KnE Social Sciences, 185-195. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i2.12763.
Situsbudaya.id. (2019, June 19). Gedung filateli Jakarta. Retrieved from https://Situsbudaya.Id/.
Spina, D. L. (2020). Adaptive sustainable reuse for cultural heritage: A multiple criteria decision aiding approach supporting urban development processes. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041363.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ade Ariyani Sari Fajarwati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)