How Do Gestures Actualize Young Learners’ Affection: Sympathizing George’s Gestures as Depicted in the Slithery Day
Keywords:Curious George, gestural expressions, speech acts, teaching values
Teaching values become the turning point on children’s behavioural learning processes where they can comprehend the values as adaptable as possible towards the supportive environments. This study targets articulating George’s gestural expressions that contribute to young learners’ affection. Data collection primarily undertook from George’s The Slithery Day episode that linked to YouTube web. Data analysis was adjustably analysed through George’s visually gestural expressions that initiated its positive and constructive speech acts accordingly. However, Oliveira’s (2009) directives options use of imperatives, declaratives, and interrogatives were attributed to accomplish the content analysis. The results recorded that George’s gestural expressions might teach young learners about showing hospitality and helping to each other, setting off innovativeness with the variously tiring endeavours, eagerly willing to know something new as addressing the life skills, and respecting someone else creations, as well as performing the capability of conveying, promising, asking, demanding, commanding, requesting, complaining, and announcing that supported the empirical speech acts. These gestural expressions afford the functional, observable, workable, concrete and empirical positions as if showing the recognizable relationships and the goodness in George’s interactions with others. However, George’s experientially gestural expressions symbolised non-verbal communication agreements to the significance of young learners’ sensitive adaptability in their daily learning and interaction processes.
Acosta, A. C. P. (2014). “Classroom project: The importance of paralinguistic features when teaching English to beginner learners”. Master Thesis, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira Facultad de Bellas Artes YHumanidades Licenciaturaen Lengua Inglesa, Pereira.
Altikriti, S. F. (2011). Speech act analysis to short stories. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(6), 1374–1384. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.6.1374-1384
Anae, N. (2014). Language speaking the subject speaking the arts: New possibilities for interdisciplinarity in Arts/English education–explorations in three-dimensional storytelling. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 13(2), 113–140.
Archaeology. (2006). Curious George and the looted idol. Retrieved August 22, 2020 from http://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id:2103/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=20423879&site=ehost-live
Babayiǧit, S. (2014). Contributions of word-level and verbal skills to written expression: Comparison of learners who speak English as a first (L1) and second language (L2). Reading & Writing, 27, 1207–1229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9482-z
Bahing, E., & Rafli, Z. (2018). English speech acts of illocutionary force in class interaction. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(3), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.3p.113
Bayat, N. (2013). A study on the use of speech acts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.057
Bernardis, P., & Gentilucci, M. (2005). Speech and gesture share the same communication system. Neuropsychologia, 44(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.05.007
Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2010). Listening comprehension, oral expression, reading comprehension, and written expression: Related yet unique language systems in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019319
Butler, J. (2017). Bodies in composition: Teaching writing through kinesthetic performance. Composition Studies, 45(2), 73–90.
Cumming, A. (2013). Multiple dimensions of academic language and literacy development. Language Learning, 63(S1), 130–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00741.x
Daffurn, N. (2019). Foundations of multiliteracies: Reading, writing and talking in the 21st century (2018) and elaborating multi literacies through multimodal texts: Changing classroom practices and developing teaching pedagogies (2019). Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 27(3), 58–61.
Davenport, D. P. (2009). Curious George can entice the emergent reader. Retrieved August 11, 2020, from https://www.proquest.com/docview/223418581/877E5BAFDA9F4266PQ/1
Dere, Z. (2019). Investigating the creativity of children in early childhood education institutions. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 652–658. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070302
England, D., Descartes, L., & Collier-Meek, M. A. (2011). Gender role portrayal and the Disney Princesses. Sex Roles, 64(7), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9930-7
Fazelian, P., & Azimi, S. (2013). Creativity in schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 719–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.335
Glăveanu, V. P. (2011). Children and creativity: A most (un)likely pair? Thinking skills and creativity, 6(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2011.03.002
Glisan, E. W, Swender, E., & Surface, E. A. (2013). Oral proficiency standards and foreign language teacher candidates: Current findings and future research directions. Foreign Language Annals, 46(2), 264–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12030
Greenstone, D. (2005). Frightened George: How the pediatric-educational complex ruined the Curious George series. Journal of Social History, 39(1), 221–300. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsh.2005.0103
Green, M. (2016). Speech acts. Oxford: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics.
Guthrie, J., Petty, R., & Yongvanich, K. (2004). Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(2), 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930410533704
Hade, D. D. (2001). Curious George gets branded: Reading as consuming. Theory into Practice, 40(3), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4003_3
Haugh, Michael. (2013). Disentangling face, facework and im/politeness. Sociocultural Pragmatics (SOPRAG), 1(1), 46–73. https://doi.org/10.1515/soprag-2012-0005
Hu, G., & Lam, S. T. E. (2010). Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: Exploring peer review in a second language writing class. Instructional Science, 38(4), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1
Hughes, J., & King, A. E. (2010). Dual pathways to expression and understanding: Canadian coming-of-age graphic novels. Children’s Literature in Education, 41(1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-009-9098-8
Iddings, A. C. D, Risko, V. J, & Rampulla, M. P. (2009). When you don’t speak their language: Guiding English-language learners through conversations about text. The Reading Teacher, 63(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.63.1.5
Im, S., & Kim, O. -J. (2013). An approach to teach science to students with limited language proficiency: In the case of students with hearing impairment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1393–1406.
Irr, C. (1999). Curious George at the border: American intellectual property and Canadian culture. Essays on Canadian Writing, 68, 266–292.
Jay, S. (2006). Curious George an unpretentious, Low-tech animated movie with a perfectly calibrated tone of silliness. Retrieved August 3, 2020, from https://www.proquest.com/docview/461321477/ F6C8D1ECBDFD47B5PQ/1
Jiménez, K. P. (2014). The making of a queer Latina cartoon: Pedagogies of border, body, and home. Journal of Latino/Latin American Studies, 6(2), 125–134.
Kim, Y. –S. G, Park, C. & Park, Y. (2015). Dimensions of discourse level oral language skills and their relation to reading comprehension and written composition: An exploratory study. Reading & Writing, 28(5), 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9542-7
Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review. Retrieved December 29, 2020, from https://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/CriticalThinkingReviewFINAL.pdf
Larrotta, C., & Moon, J. C. (2016). Literacy development and language expression for adult learners in transition. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 149, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.20173
Lee, L. (2014). Digital news stories: Building language learners’ content knowledge and speaking skills. Foreign Language Annals, 47(2), 338–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12084
Lewis, D. K. (1999). Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, H. -C. K., Chao, C-. J., & Huang, T. -C. (2015). From a perspective on foreign language learning anxiety to develop an affective tutoring system. Educational Technology Research & Development, 63(5), 727–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9385-6
Malec, A., Peterson, S. S., & Elshereif, H. (2017). Assessing young children’s oral language: Recommendations for classroom practice and policy. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue Canadienne de l’éducation, 40(3), 362–392.
Mhichíl, N. G. M., Appel, C., Ciardubháin, C. Ó., Jager, S., & Prizel-Kania, A. (2015). Designing the online oral language learning environment speak apps. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 32(3), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-12-2014-0034
Neuendorf, K. A. (2011). Content analysis–A methodological primer for gender research. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 64(3-4), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9893-0
Oliveira, A. W. (2010). Engaging students in guided science inquiry discussions: Elementary teachers’ oral strategies. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(7), 747–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9168-1
Perera, D. P, Eales, R. T. J., & Blashki, K. (2009). Supporting the creative drive: Investigating paralinguistic voice as a mode of interaction for artists with upper limb disabilities. Universal Access in the Information Society, 8(2). 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-008-0130-3
Pichler, D. C., Hochgesang, J. A., Lillo-Martin, D., & de Quadros, R. M. (2010). Conventions for sign and speech transcription of child bimodal bilingual corpora in ELAN. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 1(1), 11–40. https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.1.1.03che
Primi, T. De. C. N., & Wechsler, S. M. (2018). Creativity and innovation: Skills for the 21st Century. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 35(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752018000300002
Reid, M. B. (2013). Paralinguistic cues and their effect on leader credibility. Master Thesis: Gonzaga University, Washington.
Rey, H. A. (1941). Curious George. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Rusu, O., & Chiriță, M. (2017). Verbal, non-verbal and para verbal skills in the patient-kine to therapist relationship. Timişoara Physical Education and Rehabilitation Journal, 10(19), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/tperj-2017-0014
Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology‐integrated approach for engaged student learning. Education Technology Research and Development, 56(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9091-8
Searle, J. R. (2000). Consciousness. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 557–578. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.557
Sharp, C. (2004). Developing young children’s creativity: What can we learn from research? Topic, 32, 5–12.
Singleton, Jr., R. A., & Straits, B. C. (1999). Approach to social research (3rd Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Spasova, L. (2011). Paralinguistics as an expression of communicative behaviour. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 9(3), 204–209.
Stephens, K. (2007). Curiosity and wonder: Cue into children’s inborn motivation to learn. Retrieved Dec 12, 2020, from https://www.easternflorida.edu/community-resources/child-development-centers/parent-resource-library/documents/curiosity-and-wonder.pdf
Sumekto, D. R., & Setyawati, H. (2020). Revealing lecturer’s paralinguistic attribution: How the visual manner contributes to students’ non-cognitive skills. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i3.23206
Uçar, İ. (2012). Body language in Kutadgu Bilig. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 7(4), 3045–3058.
von Agris, U., Knorr, M., & Kraiss, K-. F. (2008). The significance of facial features for automatic sign language recognition. Paper presented at the 8th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition, Reutlingen, Germany, October 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/AFGR.2008.4813472
Wasike, B. (2018). Gender, para social interaction, and nonverbal communication: Testing the visual effect of sports magazine cover models. International Journal of Communication, 12, 173–199.
Westbrook, L. (2007). Chat reference communication patterns and implications: Applying politeness theory. Journal of Documentation, 63(5), 638–658. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410710827736
White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053
Wiseman, A. (2011). Powerful students, powerful words: Writing and learning in a poetry workshop. Literacy, 45(2), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2011.00586.x
Yang, Y- F. (2013). Exploring students’ language awareness through intercultural communication in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 325–342.
Zulfiqar, A. (2018). A content analysis of gender roles in destructive, physical, and verbal aggression in children television cartoon programs. Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 6(1), 101–123
Copyright (c) 2022 Didik Rinan Sumekto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)