Sign Consumption and Fetishism Behind the Hyperreality of Plant Collection Trends During a Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v13i2.7843Keywords:
sign consumption, fetishism, hyperreality, plant collection trend, social mediaAbstract
The research aimed to understand the process of sign consumption behind ornamental plant collection activities, fetishism towards plant aesthetics, and the hyperreality of ornamental plant collection lifestyle mediated by social media. The nurturing plants’ activity initially aimed to improve the fresh air quality and create a more beautiful environment that had now shifted to showing social status due to the emerging trend during the pandemic. A qualitative approach with multimodal analysis, purposive sampling, and constructivism paradigm was implemented. Three Instagram accounts of ornamental plant collectors were analyzed and interpreted through text, images, and videos. After that, the researcher constructed the finding into themes by comparing selected Instagram accounts to ensure reliability and validity. The results show that the value of plants is now shifting into a lifestyle where they are used as objects that should be shown to others. Social media boosts this ornamental plant collection trend widespread, creating hyperreality and making collectors trapped in fetishism. Academically, this research emphasizes Instagram’s role in spreading sign consumption, fetishism, hyperreality, and consumerism massively. Further research can be done by using the interview method with plant collectors to find out their direct experience. The practical implication of the research is to open the horizon of Indonesian people to avoid the trap of lifestyle trends. Another practical implication is for Financial Consultants/Advisors/Planners and Social Movement organizations to educate the public to spend money wisely and create new programs to avoid the consumerism trap even more.
Plum Analytics
References
Angeliqa, F., & Andriani, F. (2020). Hyperreality study of hijab fashion celebrity. Informasi, 50(1), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v50i1.27842.
Baudrillard, J. (2017a). The consumer society myths and structures (revised ed.). London, UK: Sage.
Baudrillard, J. (2017b). Symbolic exchange and death (2nd Ed.). Translated by I.H. Grant. London, UK: Sage.
Borgerson, J. L., & Schroeder, J. E. (2018). Making skin visible: How consumer culture imagery commodifies identity. Body and Society, 24(1-2), 103-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X18760987.
Chalmin-Pui, L. S., Griffiths, A., Roe, J., Heaton, T., & Cameron, R. (2021). Why garden? Attitudes and the perceived health benefits of home gardening. Cities, 112, 103118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103118.
Craciunescu, N. E. (2020). Drugs, brands and consumer culture: The sign-value of the products sold on the darknet marketplaces. Drugs and Alcohol Today, 21(2), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/DAT-12-2019-0048.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Damayanti, N. L., & Hidayat, M. A. (2019). Hiperreality Of social media: A phenomenology study of self confession of housewives of Facebook users. The Journal of Society and Media, 3(2), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v3n2.p261-277.
Dant, T. (1996). Fetishism and the social value of objects. Sociological Review, 44(3), 495-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1996.tb00434.x.
De Bell, S., White, M., Griffiths, A., Darlow, A., Taylor, T., Wheeler, B., & Lovell, R. (2020). Spending time in the garden is positively associated with health and wellbeing: Results from a national survey in England. Landscape and Urban Planning, 200, 103836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103836.
Exner, A., & Schützenberger, I. (2018). Creative natures: Community gardening, social class and city development in Vienna. Geoforum, 92, 181-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.04.011.
Guelmami, Z. (2019). “I got the power!”: An exploration of contemporary fetishism. Qualitative Market Research, 22(5), 781-795. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-12-2016-0124.
Hu, Y., & Mei, L. (2021). From literary illusions to media simulacra: Toward a semiotic imagology in the era of global communication. European Review, 29(4), 551-567. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798720000794.
Kompas. (2020, October 1). Digemari masyarakat, ini alasan harga Janda Bolong melambung. Retrieved on 29th March 2021 from https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2020/10/01/20213321/digemari-masyarakat-ini-alasan-harga-janda-bolong-melambung?page=all.
Kuldova, T. (2019). Fetishism and the problem of disavowal. Qualitative Market Research, 22(5), 766-780. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-12-2016-0125.
Lazzini, A., Lazzini, S., Balluchi, F., & Mazza, M. (2021). Emotions, moods and hyperreality: Social media and the stock market during the first phase of COVID-19 pandemic. Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal, 35(1), 199-215. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2020-4786.
Leeuwen, T. V. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Low, D., & Pandya, J. Z. (2019). Issues of validity, subjectivity, and reflexivity in multimodal literacy research and analysis. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 15(1), 1-22.
Morris, J. (2021). Simulacra in the age of social media: Baudrillard as the prophet of fake news. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 45(4), 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859920977154.
Murray, D. C. (2020). Selfie consumerism in a narcissistic age. Consumption Markets and Culture, 23(1), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2018.1467318.
Paraskevaidis, P., & Weidenfeld, A. (2019). Sign consumption and sign promotion in visitor attractions: A netnography of the visitor experience in Titanic Belfast. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(4), 1937-1955. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2018-0543.
Pawlett, W. (2018). ‘Media Events’ reconsidered: From ritual theory to simulation and performativity. Journal for Cultural Research, 22(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2017.1370865.
Raad, D. R. (2021). The power of collective vision: Landscape, visual media, and the production of American mountains. Journal of Cultural Geography, 38(1), 102-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873631.2020.1775005.
Reed, M., & Keech, D. (2019). Gardening cyberspace—social media and hybrid spaces in the creation of food citizenship in the Bristol city-region, UK. Landscape Research, 44(7), 822-833. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1336517
Roberts, J. M., & Cremin, C. (2019). Prosumer culture and the question of fetishism. Journal of Consumer Culture, 19(2), 213-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540517717773.
Roberts, M., & Ponting, J. (2018). Waves of simulation: Arguing authenticity in an era of surfing the hyperreal. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 55(2), 229-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690218791997.
Simon, A. (2019). The competitive consumption and fetishism of wildlife trophies. Journal of Consumer Culture, 19(2), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540517690571.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Feny Listianti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
