Registration of Geographic Indications of Alcohol Beverages from Abroad in Indonesia


  • Nurasiah Nurasiah Universitas syiah kuala
  • Teuku Kusnafizal Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Abdul Azis Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Sharfina Nur Amalina UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Zulfan Zulfan Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Sakdiyah Sakdiyah Universitas Syiah Kuala



geographical indications, alcoholic drinks, traditional knowledge


The research aimed to describe why alcoholic beverage products belonging to foreign countries can be registered in Indonesia's Geographical Indications (GI) protection regime. It outlined the legal implications of protecting foreign alcoholic beverage products in the GI protection regime. The research was normative legal research which was strengthened by interviews. The research shows that the protection of foreign alcoholic beverages in the national GI regime is caused by two factors, including disharmony between law 20/2016 and Permenkumham number 12 the Year 2019, and the GI regime gives each member country the freedom to apply the GI provisions in accordance with their national interests. Furthermore, the implications for the protection of foreign alcoholic beverage products in the GI protection regime in Indonesia, besides showing the inconsistency of GI protection arrangements for alcoholic beverage products, also injure the sense of justice for traditional alcoholic beverage activists who want their traditional knowledge products to be protected through the GI regime. 


Plum Analytics


Alfons, M. (2017). Implementasi hak kekayaan intelektual dalam perspektif negara hukum. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 14(3), 301-312.

Cañizares-Espada, M., Muñoz-Colomina, C. I., Pérez-Estébanez, R., & Urquía-Grande, E. (2021). Transparency and accessibility in municipalities: The case of social services in Spain. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 15(5), 31-54.

Chubarova, T., Maly, I., & Nemec, J. (2020). Public policy responses to the spread of COVID-19 as a potential factor determining health results: A comparative study of the Czech Republic, the Russian Federation, and the Slovak Republic. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 14(2), 60-70.

Cohen, A., Hazan, M., Tallarita, R., & Weiss, D. (2019). The politics of CEOs. Journal of Legal Analysis, 11(1), 1-45.

de Noronha, T., Nijkamp, & Rastoin, J. (2008). Traditional food production and rural sustainable development: A European challenge. London: Routledge.

Fabrice, T. (2019). Effects of fthe world heritage label in champagne region, wine tourism destination management and marketing: Theory and cases. New York: Springer Publisher.

Fisher, W. (2018). The puzzle of traditional knowledge. Duke Law Journal, 67, 1512-1578.

Indriyanto, A., & Yusnita, I. M. (2017). Aspek hukum pendaftaran merek. Depok: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Jimenez, E. A. P. (2021). The fourth amendment limits of facial recognition at the border. Duke Law Journal, 70(8), 1837-1879.

Kovac, M., Elkanawati, A., Gjikolli, V., & Vandenberghe, A. S. (2020). The covid-19 pandemic: Collective action and European public policy under stress. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 14(2), 47-59.

Kusuma, E. H. (2015). Hubungan antara moral dan agama dengan hukum. Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 28(2), 96-104.

Lestari, T. R. P. (2016). Menyoal pengaturan konsumsi minuman beralkohol di Indonesia. Jurnal Aspirasi, 7(2), 127-141.

Lin, C. H., Yu, C. C., Shih, P. K., & Wu, L. Y. (2021). STEM based artificial intelligence learning in general education for non engineering undergraduate students. Educational Technology and Society, 24(3), 224-237.

Lu, H., Zhang, X., Holt, J. B., Kanny, D., & Croft, J. B. (2018). Quantifying spatial accessibility in public health practice and research: An application to on-premise alcohol outlets, United States, 2013. International Journal of Health Geographics, 17(1), 1-13.

Merrill, T. W. (2021). The economics of leasing. Journal of Legal Analysis, 12, 221-272.

Prasetya, T. I., & Hafidz, J. (2017). Tinjauan yuridis tentang disharmonisasi peraturan daerah di kabupaten Magelang (Studi terhadap Peraturan Daerah nomor 2 tahun 2013 tentang usaha peternakan. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 12(1), 97-106.

Ramly, T. A., Sumiyati, Y., Iskandar, R., & Ruhaeni, N. (2010). Urgensi pendaftaran indikasi geografis ubi Cilembu untuk meningkatkan IPM. Mimbar: Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, 26(1), 81-91.

Serfiyani, C. Y., Hariyani, I., & Serfiyani, C. R. (2020). Pelindungan hukum terhadap minuman alkohol tradisional khas Indonesia. Jurnal Negara Hukum, 11(2), 267-287.

Sitaraman, G., Ricks, M., & Serkin, C. (2020). Regulation and the geography of inequality. SSRN Electronic Journal,m 70, 1763-1836.

Sodiqin, A. (2021). Ambigiusitas perlindungan hukum penyandang disabilitas dalam perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(1), 31-44.

Sykes, A. O. (2021). The law and economics of “forced” technology transfer and its implications for trade and investment policy (and the U.S.-China Trade War). Journal of Legal Analysis, 13(1), 127-171.

Taqyuddin. (2019). Tradition of drinking arak. In Proceeding The 7th International Symposium of Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia. Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Widodo, W. (2014). Legal protection of business in business framework agreement between the state Acfta. In Proceeding International Seminar Faculty of Law 2014: Legal Protection Interstate Businessmen (pp. 47-59). Semarang: Unissula Press 2014.

Wilson, M. A. (2021). The law of lenity: Enacting a codified federal rule of lenity. Duke Law Journal, 70(7), 1663-2702.

Zhang, T. (2020). Beyond information costs: Preference formation and the architecture of property law. Journal of Legal Analysis, 12, 1-78.






Abstract 314  .
PDF downloaded 148  .