Unraveling Indonesian Out-of-Field Science Teachers’ Learning at Work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v13i1.7373Keywords:
out-of-field teachers, workplace learning, professional learning, Indonesian context, science teachersAbstract
The research aimed to show the workplace as a substantial site of learning because it allowed learning opportunities that resulted from the nature of work and social interaction with workgroups. Learning in the workplace resulted from the demand for the upskilling of employees. Although workplace learning was often considered an informal type of learning, it allowed the employees to fill the gaps between their education and their current practice through coaching and mentoring. Workplace learning happened in schools, particularly schools that hired out-of-field teachers who did not have a teaching qualification. The qualitative single case study involving teachers with more than ten years of experience teaching junior high school science in Indonesia aimed to understand better how teachers who began teaching as out-of-field teachers learned from their experiences in the workplace. In-depth interviews were employed to gain insight into their learning processes. The findings show that schools can be a conducive environment for teachers to gradually acquire skills that are increasingly central to practice through learning from professionals (both provided and requested) and colleagues (including expert teachers). As out-of-field novices lack specific knowledge of teaching this content to students in context, workplace learning enables them to change gradually.
Plum Analytics
References
Ahn, J. (2017). Taking a step to identify how to create professional learning communities—Report of a case study of a Korean public high school on how to create and sustain a school-based teacher professional learning community. International Education Studies, 10(1), 82-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n1p82.
Billett, S. (2020). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. London: Routledge.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032.
Crawford, A., Zucker, T., Van Horne, B., & Landry, S. (2017). Integrating professional development content and formative assessment with the coaching process: The Texas school ready model. Theory Into Practice, 56(1), 56-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1241945.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791.
DeLuca, C., Bolden, B., & Chan, J. (2017). Systemic professional learning through collaborative inquiry: Examining teachers’ perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 67-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.014.
Desimone, L. M., & Pak, K. (2017). Instructional coaching as high-quality professional development. Theory Into Practice, 56(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1241947.
Du Plessis, A. E. (2017). Out-of-field teaching practices: What educational leaders need to know. Berlin: Springer.
Du Plessis, A. E., Carroll, A., & Gillies, R. M. (2015). Understanding the lived experiences of novice out-of-field teachers in relation to school leadership practices. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.937393.
Eraut, M. (2014). Developing knowledge for qualified professionals. In Workplace Learning in Teacher Education (pp. 47-72). Berlin: Springer.
Flick, U. (2018). Triangulation in data collection. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection (pp. 527-544). Berlin: Freie Universtität Berlin.
Hallinger, P., Piyaman, P., & Viseshsiri, P. (2017). Assessing the effects of learning-centered leadership on teacher professional learning in Thailand. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 464-476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.07.008.
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (1995). Critical characteristics of situated learning: Implications for the instructional design of multimedia. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228591409_Critical_characteristics_of_situated_learning_Implications_for_the_instructional_design_of_multimedia.
Hobbs, L. (2013). Teaching ‘out-of-field’as a boundary-crossing event: Factors shaping teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 271-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9333-4.
Hobbs, L., & Törner, G. (2019). Teaching out-of-field as a phenomenon and research problem. In Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field” (pp. 3-20). Berlin: Springer.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2019). Measuring out-of-field teaching. In Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field” (pp. 21-51). Berlin: Springer.
Jakaria, Y. (2014). Analisis kelayakan dan kesesuaian antara latar belakang pendidikan guru sekolah dasar dengan mata pelajaran yang diampu. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 20(4), 499-514. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v20i4.162.
Kim, E. (2011). Out-of-field secondary school teachers in Korea: Their realities and implications. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 8(1), 29-48.
Knight, S. L., Lloyd, G. M., Arbaugh, F., Gamson, D., McDonald, S. P., Nolan Jr, J., & Whitney, A. E. (2015). School-based teacher learning. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2017). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 2: Context, research questions and designs. European Journal of General Practice, 23(1), 274-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375090.
Makovec, D. (2018). The teacher’s role and professional development. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 6(2), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1802033M.
Manuti, A., Pastore, S., Scardigno, A. F., Giancaspro, M. L., & Morciano, D. (2015). Formal and informal learning in the workplace: A research review. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12044.
Parding, K., & Berg-Jansson, A. (2018). Conditions for workplace learning in professional work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(2), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-03-2017-0023.
Patton, K., & Parker, M. (2017). Teacher education communities of practice: More than a culture of collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 351-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.013.
Poell, R. F., Lundgren, H., Bang, A., Justice, S. B., Marsick, V. J., Sung, S., & Yorks, L. (2018). How do employees’ individual learning paths differ across occupations? A review of 10 years of empirical research. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(5), 315-334. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-01-2018-0019.
Sharplin, E. D. (2014). Reconceptualising out-of-field teaching: Experiences of rural teachers in Western Australia. Educational Research, 56(1), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.874160.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
Sjöberg, D., & Holmgren, R. (2021). Informal workplace learning in Swedish Police Education – A teacher perspective. Vocations and Learning, 14, 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-021-09267-3.
van Bussel, J., Justice, S., Bang, A., & Damirón-Alcántara, A. (2018). Team leaders’ beliefs about teachers’ learning-path strategies. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(5), 351-363. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-01-2018-0021.
World Bank. (2018). Indonesia economic quarterly, June 2018: Learning more, growing faster. Washington DC: World Bank.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Esti Rahayu, Shuki Osman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)