"Itu Sebuah Skandal": Lexical and Sociocultural Interpretation in Critical Discourse Analysis of Fadli Zon's Tweet

Authors

  • Joice Yulinda Luke Bina Nusantara University
  • Monika Widyastuti Surtikanti Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
  • Sumarlam Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v12i1.6907

Keywords:

scandal interpretation, lexical interpretation, sociocultural interpretation, critical discourse analysis

Abstract

There were two objectives of the research. The first was to analyze the word ‘scandal’ from textual analysis (micro-level) and sociocultural analysis (macro-level). To analyze the findings, the research made use of Norman Fairclough’s model as the basis of critical discourse analysis. The research was qualitative, which tended to use inductive as the approach. There were 23 informants who participated in the survey and the FGD. They were selected purposively based on their profession and the workplace areas. The data were the four of Fadli Zon’s tweets containing the word ‘scandal’ and its context,  which was available in some online media. Research content based on the textual analysis (microanalysis) shows that the  text structure is short and directly conveys Fadli Zon’s criticism or negative assumptions toward any policies of government issues. Besides, the macro analysis indicates Fadli Zon has a dominant power to utter the negative judgments toward the government regarding the position in the government structure as one of the leaders in the  Indonesian House of Representative. Substantially, the use of specific terms’ scandal’ overall illustrates the negative  opinions and indicating declining trust in the policymakers on certain governmental issues. The use of cynicism, sarcasm,  and satire styles colors Fadli Zon’s tweets that are also accompanying the overused of ‘scandal’ word. The analysis based  on the dimension of discourse practice (micro-level) indicates that using the word ‘scandal’ in Fadli Zon’s tweets is cynical according to the public opinions. The analysis based on the social-cultural practice dimension (macro-level) indicates that  Fadli Zon is one Indonesian politician who is often opposed to the Indonesian government policies. 

References

Ayu, A. M. (2017). Peran media dalam propaganda melawan kebijakan pemerintah Amerika Serikat. International & Diplomacy, 2(2), 265-278.

Badara, A. (2012). Analisis wacana: Teori, metode, dan penerapannya pada wacana media. Jakarta: PT Fajar Interpratama Mandiri.

Bustan, E. S., & Alakrash, H. M. (2020). Critical discourse analysis of Donald Trump’s tweets addressing the Middle Eastern countries. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 13(2), 407-414.

Cambridge Dictionary. (2016). Cambridge dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar.

Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis wacana: Pengantar analisis teks media. Yogyakarta: LKiS Group.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Language and power (5th Ed.). New York: Longman Inc.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.

Fauzan, U. (2015). Analisis wacana kritis teks berita MetroTV dan TvOne mengenai luapan lumpur Sidoarjo. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Graham, T., Jackson, D., Broersma, M. (2018). The personal in the political on Twitter: Towards a typology of politicians’ personalized tweeting behavior. In Schwanholz J., Graham T., Stoll PT. (eds), Managing Democracy in the Digital Age: Internet Regulation, Social Media Use, and Online Civic Engagement (pp. 137-157). Berlin: Springer.

Himelboim, I., Mccreery, S., & Smith, M. (2013). Birds of a feather tweet together: Integrating network and content analyses to examine cross-ideology exposure on Twitter. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(2), 154-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12001.

Hsu, C., Park, S. J., & Park, H. W. (2013). Political discourse among key Twitter users: The case Of Sejong city In South Korea. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 12(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2013.12.1.065.

Jorgensen, M., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. California: SAGE Publications.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. (n.d.). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia versi online. Retrieved from https://kbbi.web.id/skandal.

Kusno, A., & Bety, N. (2017). Analisis wacana kritis cuitan Fahri Hamzah (FH) terkait hak angket Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 6(2), 137-159. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v6i2.46.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2012). Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444347340.

Manan, N. A. (2019). “Sontoloyo” and “genderuwo”; Critical discourse analysis on Jokowi’s utterance. Langkawi: Journal of the Association for Arabic and English, 5(1), 55-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v5i1.1257.

Masroor, F., Khan, Q. N., Aib, I., & Ali, Z. (2019). Polarization and Ideological Weaving in Twitter Discourse of Politicians. Social Media and Society, 5(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119891220.

Meiristiani, N. (2011). Understandinf tenor in spoken texts in year XII English textbook to improve the appropriacy of the texts. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v1i1.98.

Merriam Webster. (2020). Merriam-Webster, Incorpoted. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scandal.

MMU. (2020). TKA China masuk Kendari, Fadli Zon: Itu skandal di tengah corona. Tajuk.Co. Retrieved from https://tajuk.co/news/tka-china-masuk-kendari-fadli-zon-itu-skandal-di-tengah-corona.

Oxford Learner’s Dictionary. (2020). Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/scandal.

Porten-Cheé, P., Haßler, J., Jost, P., Eilders, C., & Maurer, M. (2018). Popularity cues in online media: Theoritical and methodological perspectives. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 7(2), 208-230. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-80.

Purbani, W. (2009). Analisis wacana kritis dan analisis wacana feminis. Analisis Wacana, 1, 1-5.

Risdianto, F., Sumarlam., & Santosa, R. (2019). Representation of power in the news text of the inclusion of indigenous faiths on ID card (e-ktp). Nobel: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching, 10(2), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2019.10.2.131-148.

Sayyah, A., & Abu, A. R.. (2020). Critical discourse analysis of selected newspaper article addressing the Chapel Hill shooting incident. Journal of Communication Media Watch, 11(1) 21-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.15655/mw/2020/v11i1/49754.

Seto, W. A. W. (2020). Stafsus presiden Andi Taufan Surati Camat, Fadli Zon: Ini jelas sebuah skandal. Tribun Jateng. Retrieved from https://jateng.tribunnews.com/2020/04/15/stafsus-presiden-andi-taufan-surati-camat-fadli-zon-ini-jelas-sebuah-skandal.

Suciartini, N. N. A. (2017). Analisis wacana kritis “semua karena Ahok” program Mata Najwa Metro TV. Aksara, 29(2), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.29255/aksara.v29i2.54.267-282.

Sumarlam, S. (2016). Representasi kekuasaan melalui sabda raja pada teks berita mengenai konflik internal Keraton Yogyakarta (Sebuah analisis wacana kritis). International Seminar Prosiding Prasasti III: Curent Research in Linguistics. pp. 58-70. https://doi.org/10.20961/pras.v0i0.1444.

Thesaurus. (2020). Dictionary.Com. Retrieved from https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/scandal.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11-52. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-26
Abstract 50  .
PDF downloaded 14  .