Senior Lecturers’ Learning Mechanisms During Emergency Remote Teaching at Binus University

Authors

  • Esti Rahayu Universitas Bina Nusantara
  • Devina Devina Universitas Bina Nusantara

Keywords:

senior lecturers, learning mechanism, emergency remote teaching

Abstract

The ominous Covid 19 forced tertiary education institutions in Indonesia to employ emergency remote teaching (ERT) both synchronous and asynchronous online teaching from March 2020. Not all existing lecturers are professionally ready for this change, specifically senior lecturers who have been teaching for more than 25 years. These senior lecturers enter into an unfamiliar territory as they have been experiencing the drastic transition to ERT. This transition can be viewed as a learning process as they went through certain learning mechanisms. This study aims to identify senior lecturers’ experiences with online teaching during ERT. This case study examined five senior lecturers who have been teaching English as a foreign language for university level for more than 25 years. Data analysis followed the procedures developed by Braun and Clarke. Each lecturers experienced learning mechanisms that includes identification, coordination, reflection, and transformation. During the identification, they learn to understand the needs to adapt, adopt, and change. They also underwent interdependent activities to bridge between what has been done and what needs to be done during the phase of coordination through reading, joining webinars, mentoring during the coordination. Each of them reflected on the process of the shifting boundaries of their competencies or knowledge—from previously teaching offline to online. The last learning mechanism was transformation that led profound changes after experiencing disruptions in the current work flow. Those multiple disruptions shape them to face ERT

Author Biography

Devina Devina, Universitas Bina Nusantara

Language Center, Bina Nusantara University

References

Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Davey, R. (2013). The professional identity of teacher educators: Career on the cusp? Routledge.

Feiman-Nemser, S., & Remillard, J. (1995). Perspectives on learning to teach. National Center for Research on Teacher Learning, Michigan State University ….

Golden, C. (2020). Remote teaching: The glass half-full. EDUCAUSE Review. Https://Er. Educause. Edu/Blogs/2020/3/Remote-Teaching-the-Glass-Half-Full.

Guile, D., & Griffiths, T. (2001). Learning through work experience. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 113–131.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.

Lavine, R., Greenberg, J., Chen, J., Kao, K., & Lin, Y. T. (2012). East Meets West: A Virtual International Teacher Education Initiative Between Taiwan and the US 1. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 16(1), 35.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook.

Pamuk, S. (2012). Understanding preservice teachers’ technology use through TPACK framework. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(5), 425–439.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.

Suchman, L. (1993). Working relations of technology production and use. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2(1–2), 21–39.

Tsai, H.-C. (2015). A Senior Teacher’s Implementation of Technology Integration. International Education Studies, 8(6), 151–161.

Tuomi-Grohn, T., & Engestrom, Y. (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary crossing. Taylor & Francis US.

UNESCO. (2020). COVID-19 Educational Disruption and Response.

Published

2021-02-10
Abstract 17  .