The Effect of Pornography Discourse on the Reception of Novel Stensilan by Enny Arrow

Authors

  • Ariska Puspita Anggraini Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Dwi Susanto Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret
  • Wakit Abdullah Rais Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v12i2.6905

Keywords:

discourse, pornography, reception sex, stencil

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the pornography discourse in the reception of Enny Arrow's stencil novels among millennial men. The study is qualitative. The research sample focused on two millennial men in Surakarta who read the novel Enny Arrow stencil intensively. The data collected by interviews and observations over six months. In this study, researchers asked two newly recognized millennial men to read and interpret Enny Arrow's stenciled novel. After that, the researcher looks at the effect on the social relationships of the participants. The theory used to analyze the data in this study was Normand Holland's psychoanalytic literary reception. After the data analysis process, it was revealed that pornography can be both a consumption and a taboo subject. Although it is considered a sensational topic of conversation, the participants considered pornography should not be used as a general topic of conversation.

Keywords: pornography, discourse, sex, stencil novel, Enny Arrow

References

Alatriste, L. (2013). Psychoanalytic literary criticism: Using Holland’s DEFT model as a reader response tool in the language classroom. Language and Psychoanalisys, 2(1), 20-49. https://doi.org/10.7565/landp.2013.0002.

Arifin, E. (2019). Siapakah Enny Arrow? Retrieved 1st January 2021 from https://serikatnews.com/siapakah-enny-arrow/.

Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis wacana. Yogyakarta: LkiS.

Ester. (2016). Mengenal generasi milenial. Retrieved 5th March 2021 from https://www.kominfo.go.id/content/detail/8566/mengenal-generasi-millennial/0/sorotan_media.

Fathurizki, A., & Malau, R. (2018). Pornografi dalam film: Analisis resepsi film “Men, Women & Children”. Jurnal Kajian Televisi dan Film, 2(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.24198/ptvf.v2i1.1134.

Gunawan, F. X. (2000). Refleksi atas kelamin. Magelang: Indonesia Tera.

Holland, N. N. (1980). Unity, identity, text, self. In J. Tompkins (Ed.), Reader response criticism (pp. 118-134). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.

Iskhak., Saleh, M., Sofwan, A., & Hartono, R. (2017). Investigating the effects of reader response journals on the quality of teacher trainees’ responses to literary works. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(10), 831-840. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0710.02.

Mambrol, N. (2016). Psychological reader response theory. Retrieved from https://literariness.org/2016/11/18/psychological-reader%E2%80%91response-theory/.

Minderop, A. (2010). Psikologi sastra. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Muhammad, H. (2013). Bukan soal tubuh, tetapi ruh. Jurnal Perempuan, 18(2), 103-113.

Nugroho, B. A. (2019). Perlawanan perempuan terhadap dominasi patriarki dalam novel ’Geni Jora’ karya Abidah El Khalieqy kajian feminisme psikoanalisis Karen Horney. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 8(2), 148-156.

Prabasmoro, A. P. (2007). Kajian budaya feminis: tubuh, sastra, dan budaya pop. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.

Silaswati, D. (2019). Analisis wacana kritis dalam pengkajian wacana. Metamorfosis: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 12(1), 1-10.

Suarnaningsih, R., Junaid, S., & Nahdhiyah. (2020). Audience response of racism in ’Hidden Figures’ movie. Elite Journal, 7(1), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.24252/elite.v7i1a8.

Suwardi. (2009). Kramanisasi seks dalam kehidupan orang Jawa melalui ungkapan tradisional. Humaniora, 21(3), 274-284. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.971.

Spirovska, E. (2019). Reader-response theory and approach: Application, values and significance for students in literature courses. SEEU Review, 14(1), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2019-0003.

Tyson, L. (2006). Critical theory today. New York: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-03
Abstract 151  .
PDF downloaded 10  .