Disruptive Innovation: A Case of Solving Hoax Information in Indonesia

Authors

  • Tukina Tukina Bina Nusantara University
  • Abd.Razak M Mozin Bina Nusantara University
  • Marta Sanjaya Bina Nusantara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v11i1.6088

Keywords:

disruptive innovation, Information Communication of Technology (ICT), millennial era, hoax information

Abstract

The research discussed hoax information as an effect of disruptive innovation and how to solve it in society. It applied a qualitative descriptive method with a case study focusing on hoax information of 10 million Chinese workers who came to Indonesia. The research was a library research conducted through various sources of literature and journals. Data analysis was carried out by answering the points that were analyzed and cross-checked to other data sources in order to answer the research questions. It is found that living in the millennial changes rapidly; various forms of innovation are born and developed very quickly, and so do the problems and challenges. To prevent the spread of hoax information, some efforts need to be done to understand the process, ethics implementation, law enforcement, and accountability of information.

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

Author Biographies

Tukina Tukina, Bina Nusantara University

Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Komunikasi

Abd.Razak M Mozin, Bina Nusantara University

Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Komunikasi

Marta Sanjaya, Bina Nusantara University

Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Komunikasi

References

Alpi, K. M., & Evans, J. J. (2019). Distinguishing case study as a research method from case reports as a publication type. Journal of Medical Library Assosiation, 107(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.615.

Anggarini, V. (February 14th, 2018). Awas, informasi hoax soal tenaga kerja China di Indonesia. Retrieved from https://kumparan.com/vidya-anggraini/awas-informasi-hoax-soal-tenaga-kerja-china-di-indonesia.

Baldacchino (2008). Entrepreneurial creativity and innovation. The First International Conference on Strategic Innovation and Future Creativity. Malta, University Malta.

Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.

Christensen, C. M., McDonald, R., Altman, E. J., & Palmer, J. E. (2018). Disruptive innovation: An intellectual history and directions for future research. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1043-1078. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12349.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative enquiry and research design: Choosing among five. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.

Juliswara, V. (2017). Mengembangkan model literasi media yang berbhineka dalam menganalisis informasi palsu (hoax) di media sosial. Pemikiran Sosiologi, 4(2), 142-164. https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v4i2.28586.

Khotimah, R. H. (April 27th, 2017). Fenomena hoax di Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.kompasiana.com/ririnhusnul/59018ba1f47e611f16e50baa/fenomena-hoax-di-indonesia?page=all#.

Kumaraswamy, A., Garud, R., & Ansari, S. (2018). Perspectives on disruptive innovations. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1025-1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12399.

Morlandsta, L. (2019). Innovation and value creation in local media. The Journal of Media Innovation, 5(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.5617/jomi.4350.

Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods, qualitative and quantitative approaches. University of Wisconsin at Whitewater: Pearson.

Starman, A. B. (2013). The case Study as a type of qualitative research. Jounal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 1, 29-43.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-23

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract 669  .
PDF downloaded 498  .