Visual Style of 21 Intelectual Property Right (IPR) Certified Lasem Batik Motifs as the Expression of Cultural Hybridity

Authors

  • Yunita Setyoningrum Interior Design Design Study Program, Faculty of Art and Design, Maranatha Christian University, Jl. Surya Sumantri 65 Bandung 40164, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8908-0518
  • Christine Claudia Lukman Visual Communication Design Study Program, Faculty of Art and Design, Maranatha Christian University, Jl. Surya Sumantri 65 Bandung 40164, Indonesia
  • Sandy Rismantojo Visual Communication Design Study Program, Faculty of Art and Design, Maranatha Christian University, Jl. Surya Sumantri 65 Bandung 40164, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v10i3.5680

Keywords:

visual style, lasem batik, lasem batik motifs, cultural hybridity

Abstract

The problem in this research derived from the fact that many Lasem batik entrepreneurs nowadays had limited knowledge of the novel characteristics of Lasem batik and hardly aware of its geographical indication. The research objective was to identify how the cultural hybridity of Chinese-Javanese culture and Lasem geographical environment were reflected by both the Tionghoa Peranakan-descent and Javanese-descent artists through the visual signs in the batik design. The purposive samples used were 21 Lasem batik motifs made by Tionghoa Peranakan-descent and Javanese-descent entrepreneurs which already IPR-certified. The method used was a compositional interpretation by interpreting each batik motif composition according to its content (subject matter), color, spatial organization, and expressive content (the combined effect of subject matter and visual form). The finding reveals that Lasem visual style hybridity is generally visible in: (1) the use of Chinese subject matter combined with Javanese motifs, (2) the use of Chinese subject matter combined with local Javanese isen-isen (texture), and (3) the rich use of red (from Chinese batik visual style) combined with brown (from Javanese batik visual style). This finding can be used as a reference guide for latter Lasem batik entrepreneurs to maintain the particular characteristics of Lasem batik while developing other batik motifs innovation.

References

Chan, C. S. (2015). Style and creativity in design. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-14017-9.

Kobayashi, S. (2009). The aim and method of the color image scale. Color Research & Application, 6(2), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.5080060210

Lee, T. (2016). Defining the aesthetics of the Nyonyas’ batik sarongs in the straits settlements, late nineteenth to early twentieth century. Asian Studies Review, 40(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2016.1162137.

Lestari, S. N., & Wiratama, N. S. (2019). Dari opium hingga batik: Lasem dalam “kuasa” Tionghoa abad XIXXX. Patrawidya: Seri Penerbitan Penelitian Sejarah dan Budaya, 19(3), 253–270. Retrieved from https://patrawidya.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/patrawidya/article/view/100.

Lukman, C. C., Setyoningrum, Y., & Rismantojo, S. (2018). Indonesian Chinese visual language of ‘Qilin’ on Lasem batik altar cloth (Tok Wi). Journal of Arts and Humanities, 7(9), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v7i9.1488.

Maulany, N. N., & Masruroh, N. N. (2017). Kebangkitan industri batik Lasem di awal abad XXI. Patrawidya, 18(1), 1–12.

McMullen, M. (2016). Intercultural design competence: A guide for graphic designers working across cultural boundaries. The International Journal of Visual Design, 10(3), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1581/CGP/v10i03/19-30.

Nurhajarini, D. R., Purwaningsih, E., & Fibiona, I. (2015). Akulturasi lintas zaman di Lasem: Perspektif sejarah dan budaya (kurun niaga-sekarang). Yogyakarta:Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan, Balai Pelestarian Nilai Budaya (BPNB) Yogyakarta.

Radford.edu. (n.d). The language of art: Representation, abstraction, line, amd color. Retrieved from https://www.radford.edu/rbarris/art216upd2012/artlanguageintro.html.

Rahmatullah, I. (2014). Perlindungan indikasi geografis dalam Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) melalui ratifikasi perjanjian Lisabon. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 2(2), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i2.1470.

Sautier, D., Biénabe, E., & Cerdan, C. (2011). Geographical indications in developing countries. In E. Barham & B. Sylvander (Eds.), Labels of Origin for Food: Local Development, Global Recognition (pp. 138–153). https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845933524.0138.

Situngkir, H. (2009). The phylomemetics of batik. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1481394

Steiner, H. (1995). Cross-cultural design: Communicating in the global marketplace (1st Ed.). London: Hong Kong University Press.

Walker, J. A. (2010). Desain, sejarah, budaya. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra. Retrieved from https://openlibrary.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pustaka/26387/desainsejarah-budaya-cet-1.html.

Zajko, M. (2012). Rose, Gillian, visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne deSociologie, 49(4), 449–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.2012.01310.x.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-05

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract 623  .
PDF downloaded 123  .