Riding Out the Storm: Out-of-Field Teaching Practice in Indonesia

Authors

  • Esti Rahayu Universitas Bina Nusantara
  • Shuki Osman Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v10i2.5628

Keywords:

out-of-field teachers, teacher commitment, professional learning, school supports

Abstract

As out-of-field teachers existence led to change in teachers, this research aimed to explore their commitment to learning and teaching, and how their schools supported them. Five Indonesian teachers who started teaching as out-of-field teachers and their school leaders were interviewed for this research. The qualitative case study was employed to explore the problem through interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis. The findings reveal that the initial commitment to teaching, learning, and growing is an investment for further actions throughout the teaching practice. The schools provide necessary assistance through the induction and during their in-service in the provided and requested professional learning, being trusted and acknowledged by school leaders, and having resourceful colleagues. From their schools’ support, the out-of-field teachers become more knowledgeable and remain as teachers for an extended time.

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

References

Billett, S. (1993). What’s in a setting? Learning in the workplace. Australian Journal of Adult and Community Education, 33(1), 4–14.

Billett, S. (2003). Workplace mentors: Demands and benefits. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(3), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620310468441.

Billett, S. (2004). Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(6), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620410550295.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. California: SAGE publications.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Recruiting and retaining teachers: Turning around the race to the bottom in high-need schools. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 4(1), 16–32. doi: 10.3776/joci.2010.v4n1p16-32.

Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B. T., Haselkorn, D., & Fideler, E. (1999). Teacher recruitment, selection, and induction: Policy influences on the supply and quality of teachers. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 183–232). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Day, C. (2008). Committed for life? Variations in teachers’ work, lives and effectiveness. Journal of Educational Change, 9(3), 243–260. doi: 10.1007/s10833-007-9054-6.

Day, C., Elliot, B., & Kington, A. (2005). Reform, standards and teacher identity: Challenges of sustaining commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 563–577. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.001.

Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2007). Variations in the conditions for teachers’ professional learning and development: Sustaining commitment and effectiveness over a career. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701450746.

Du Plessis, A. E. (2013). Understanding the out-of-field teaching experience (PhD thesis). Queensland: The University of Queensland.

Du Plessis, A. E. (2017). Out-of-field teaching practices: What educational leaders need to know. Berlin: Springer.

Du Plessis, A., Carroll, A., & Gillies, R. M. (2015). Understanding the lived experiences of novice out-of-field teachers in relation to school leadership practices. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.937393.

Eraut, M. (2014). Developing knowledge for qualified professionals. In O. Mcnamara, J. Murray, & M. Jones (Eds.), Workplace learning in teacher education (pp. 47–72). Berlin: Springer.

Fransson, G., & Frelin, A. (2016). Highly committed teachers: What makes them tick? A study of sustained commitment. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 22(8), 896–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1201469.

Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2004). Expansive learning environments: Integrating organizational and personal development. In A. Fuller (Ed.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 126–144). Abingdon: Routledge.

Hobbs, L. (2012). Teaching out-of-field: Factors shaping identities of secondary science and mathematics. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 58(1), 21−29.

Hobbs, L. (2013). Teaching ‘out-of-field' as a boundary-crossing event: Factors shaping teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 271–297. doi: 10.1007/s10763-012-9333-4.

Huberman, M. (1989). The professional life cycle of teachers. Teachers College Record, 91(1), 31−57.

Ingersoll, R. M. (2005). The problem of underqualified teachers: A sociological perspective. Sociology of Education, 78(2), 175–178. doi: 10.1177/003804070507800206.

Ingersoll, R. (2006). Understanding supply and demand among mathematics and science teachers. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/136.

Jakaria, Y. (2014). Analisis kelayakan dan kesesuaian antara latar belakang pendidikan guru sekolah dasar dengan mata pelajaran yang diampu. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 20(4), 499–514. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24832%2Fjpnk.v20i4.162.

Jarvis-Selinger, S., Pratt, D. D., & Collins, J. B. (2010). Journeys toward becoming a teacher: Charting the course of professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(2), 69–95.

Kim, E. G. (2011). Out-of-field secondary school teachers in Korea: Their realities and implications. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 8(1), 29−48.

Lampert, M., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Aligning teacher education with contemporary K-12 reform visions. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 33–53). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28(1), 27–42.

Robinson, V. (1985). Making do in the classroom: A report on the misassignment of teachers. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED263108.

Scribner, S. (1985). Knowledge at work. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 16(3), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1985.16.3.05x1486d.

Sharplin, E. D. (2014). Reconceptualising out-of-field teaching: Experiences of rural teachers in Western Australia. Educational Research, 56(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.874160.

Törner, G., & Törner, A. (2012). Underqualified Math teachers or out-of-field-teaching in Mathematics-a neglectable field of action? In Mathematikunterricht im Kontext von Realität, Kultur und Lehrerprofessionalität (pp. 196−206). Vieweg+ Teubner Verlag.

Tsui, K. T., & Cheng, Y. C. (1999). School organizational health and teacher commitment: A contingency study with multi-level analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.5.3.249.3883.

Tyree Jr, A. K. (1996). Conceptualizing and measuring commitment to high school teaching. The Journal of Educational Research, 89(5), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1996.9941331.

Van Veen, K., Sleegers, P., & Van de Ven, P. H. (2005). One teacher’s identity, emotions, and commitment to change: A case study into the cognitive–affective processes of a secondary school teacher in the context of reforms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.004.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-13

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract 1486  .
PDF downloaded 387  .