Children’s Empathy and Family Income: The Mediating Role of Family Communication Pattern
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v10i2.5510Keywords:
children’s empathy, family income, family communication patternAbstract
The research examined whether the communication patterns in the family by conversation and conformity orientations served as mediators of the relation between children’s empathy and family income. The research was conducted to parents of children age six to eight years old as the participants (N = 233) in Jakarta, Indonesia. The parents’ completed parent’s questionnaire for children’s empathy, family income, and family communication pattern. The relation analyzed using PROCESS Hayes. The results that the family communication pattern partially mediated the children’s empathy and family income. This research result shows a couple of findings. First, the children who come from a low-income family with family conformity orientation have lower empathy. The second finding is that the children with the family who have family conversation orientation have higher empathy. This second finding works for both low and high incomes family. Besides, only conformity orientation is found to mediate the effect of family income on child’s empathy. This research finds there are connections between family environment and children’s behavior. Developing the children’s empathy going to be positive for their social-emotional outcomes in the future is paramount because the children learn to express and regulate their emotion in a positive way when they have higher empathy.
Plum Analytics
References
Blair, C., McKinnon, R. D., & Daneri, M. P. (2018). Effect of the tools of the mind kindergarten program on children’s social and emotional development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 43(2), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.01.002.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2002). Toward a theory of Family. Communication Theory, 12(1), 70-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/12.1.70.
Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2006). Family communication patterns theory: A social cognitive approach. In D. O. Braithwaite & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Engaging Theories in Family Communication: Multiple Perspectives (pp. 50-65). California: Sage Publications, Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204420.n4.
Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2016). Understanding family communication patterns and family functioning: The roles of conversation orientation and conformity orientation. Annals of the International Communication Association, 26(1), 36–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2002.11679010.
Odenweller, K. G., & Harris, T. M. (2018). Intergroup socialization: The influence of parents’ family communication patterns on adult children’s racial prejudice and tolerance. Communication Quarterly, 66(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2018.1452766.
Offrey, L. D., & Rinaldi, C. M. (2017). Parent–child communication and adolescents’ problem-solving strategies in hypothetical bullying situations. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2014.884006.
Paulus, M., & Leitherer, M. (2017). Preschoolers’ social experiences and empathy-based responding relate to their fair resource allocation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 161, 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.005.
Paulus, M., & Moore, C. (2017). Preschoolers’ generosity increases with understanding of the affective benefits of sharing. Development Science, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12417.
Sabato, H., & Kogut, T. (2019). Feel good, do good? Subjective well-being and sharing behavior among children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 177, 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.08.009.
Sánchez-Pérez, N., Fuentes, L. J., Jolliffe, D., & González-Salinas, C. (2014). Assessing children’s empathy through a Spanish adaptation of the basic empathy scale: Parent’s and child’s report forms. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01438.
Scrimgeour, M. B., Blandon, A. Y., Stifter, C. A., & Buss, K. A. (2013). Cooperative coparenting moderates the association between parenting practices and children’s prosocial behavior. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(3), 506–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032893.
Stern, J. A., & Cassidy, J. (2018). Empathy from infancy to adolescence: An attachment perspective on the development of individual differences. Developmental Review, 47, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2017.09.002.
Xuan, X., Chen, F., Yuan, C., Zhang, X., Luo, Y., Xue, Y., & Wang, Y. (2018). The relationship between parental conflict and preschool children’s behavior problems: A moderated mediation model of parenting stress and child emotionality. Children and Youth Services Review, 95, 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.10.021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
