The Practice of Wearing Hijab in a Multicultural Mosque of America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v9i2.4430Keywords:
hijab, cultural hybridity, multicultural space, Muslimness, America’s mosqueAbstract
This research examined the practice of wearing the hijab among Hampton Roads Muslim women of Islamic Center of Tidewater (known as the ODU Mosque) in Norfolk, Virginia. This research asked two main questions: how did Muslim women at the ODU Mosque negotiate the social meanings embedded in the hijab? And, how did the ODU mosque as a cultural institution and as a multicultural space for Muslim women shape their practice of wearing the hijab? This research followed qualitative research method. The observation was primarily conducted during November 2017. For this research, interviews were conducted with five Muslim women who were at least 18 years of age, resided in Norfolk. This research finds that there is a cultural hybridization of the practices of wearing the hijab among Muslim women of this community. Moreover, by using the concept of ‘space’ by de Certeau, the researchers contend that the mosque has become not only a place of worship but space for them to interact and negotiate their Islamic practices or so-called their Muslimness. The ODU mosque is a space for them to negotiate their practices of Islamic rulings including the hijab.
Plum Analytics
References
Ahmed, L. (2011). A quiet revolution the veil’s resurgence, from the Middle East to America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Akou, H. (2010). Interpreting Islam through the Internet: Making sense of hijab. Contemporary Islam, 4(3), 331–346.
Al Wazni, A. (2015). Muslim women in America and hijab: A study of empowerment, feminist identity, and body image. Social Work, 60(4), 325–333.
Bagby, I. (2012). The American mosque 2011 (US mosque study 2011). Washington D.C.: Council on American-Islamic Relations.
Bhowon, U., & Bundhoo, H. (2016). Perceptions and reasons for veiling. Psychology and Developing Societies, 28(1), 29–49.
Bouvier, G. (2016). Discourse in clothing: The social semiotics of modesty and chic in hijab fashion. Gender and Language, 10(3), 364–385.
Cevik, N. (2016). Muslimism in Turkey and beyond [e-book] religion in the modern world. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chioco, I. V. (2017). Looking beyond the veil. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 24(2), 547–573.
De Certeau, M. (2011). The practice of everyday. Translated by S. Rendall. (3rd edition). California: University of California Press.
Hamzeh, M. Z., & Oliver, K. (2010). Gaining research access into the lives of Muslim girls: Researchers negotiating “Muslimness”, modesty, “Inshallah”, and “Haram”. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE), 23(2), 165–180.
Honkatukia, P., & Keskinen, S. (2018). The social control of young women’s clothing and bodies: A perspective of differences on racialization and sexualization. Ethnicities, 18(1), 142–161.
Jeldtoft, D. N., Dessing, D. N. M., Nielsen, P. J. S., Woodhead, P. L., Catto, D. R., & Woodhead, P. L. (2013). 1 tactical and strategic religion. UK: Ashgate. Retrieved from https://www.123library.org/ebook/isbn/9781472417541/.
Khan, N. (2015). Fashionably modest [Amazon video]. Zujaja Creative. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/Fashionably-Modest-Dina-Torkia/dp/B01N9CZGSW.
Lapidus, I. M. (2002). A history of Islamic societies (2nd edition). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Litchmore, R. V. H., & Safdar, S. (2016). Meanings of the hijab: Views of Canadian Muslim women. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(3), 198–208.
Medina, J. (2014). This battlefield called my body: Warring over the Muslim female. Religions, 5(3), 876–885.
Moaddel, M. (2013). The birthplace of the Arab spring: Values and perceptions of Tunisians and a comparative assessment of Egyptian, Iraqi, Lebanese, Pakistani, Saudi, Tunisian, and Turkish Publics. Michigan: University of Michigan’s Institute for Social Research. Retrieved from https://mevs.org/files/tmp/Tunisia_FinalReport.pdf.
Pieterse, J. N. (2015). Globalization and culture global mélange (3rd edition). Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Roded, R. (2010). Women, family, and gender in Islamic Law by Judith E. Tucker. International Journal Middle East Studies, 42(3), 524-526. doi: 10.2307/40784842.
Strabac, Z., Aalberg, T., Jenssen, A. T., & Valenta, M. (2016). Wearing the veil: Hijab, Islam and job qualifications as determinants of social attitudes towards immigrant women in Norway. Ethnic
and Racial Studies, 39, 2665–2682. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2016.1164878.
Tariq-Munir, E. (2014). The dynamics of wearing hijab for Muslim American women in the United States. In A. M. Kusow, G. Jones-Johnson, & A. Prokos (Eds.). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Van Roojen, P. (2011). Islamic fashion (Pepin fashion, textile and patterns). Amsterdam: Pepin Press.
Wang, Y. (2017). Muslim women’s evolving leadership roles: A case study of women leaders in an immigrant Muslim community in post-9/11 America. Social Compass, 64(3), 424–441.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)