Revolting Against Imperialism and Capitalism in Sherlock Holmes: a Game of Shadows (2011)

Authors

  • Alberta Natasia Adji Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v8i2.3891

Keywords:

imperialism, capitalism, social class, greimas’ narrative structure

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to reveal the struggle among imperialism, capitalism, and social class dominance found within Guy Ritchie’s A Game of Shadows (2011), which was set in Britain, France, and Germany in 1891. British imperialism, capitalism, and social class were very well-related since they formed the basic classic social tradition in European countries that confined minorities such as working-class people and immigrants. The study was particularly focused on (1) the imperialist and capitalist representations were portrayed by Professor Moriarty as the much honoured academic figure who was able to disguise his criminal activities, and (2) the revolt of the marginalized people which were represented by the working-class; Gypsy immigrant minorities who are isolated from the imperialist West European social class strata. The study was conducted using the perspectives of AJ Greimas’ narrative structure through identifying all of the sequences and actantial models of the film, as well as relating them to capitalism and social class issues. The result of the study shows that the film has managed to show the success in fighting against imperialism and capitalism that initially determine the characters’ positions.

References

Barthes, R., & Duisit, L. (1975). An Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narrative. Source: New Literary History, 6(2), 237-272. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/468419

Bell, E. (2016). Soft Power And Corporate Imperialism: Maintaining British Influence. Race & Class, 57(4), 75-86.

Braun, D. (2013). Contextualism About “Might” And Says-That Ascriptions. Philos Studies Springer, 164(2), 485-511.

Clark, H. C. (2012). Violence, “Capitalism”, and the Civilizing Process in Early Modern Europe. Society, 49(2), 122-130. doi:10.1007/s12115-011-9515-7.

Cole, M. (2004). “Rule Britannia” and the New American Empire: a Marxist analysis of the teaching of imperialism, actual and potential, in the British school curriculum. Policy Futures in Education, 2(3&4), 523-538.

Conway, S. (2004). War, Imperial Expansion, and Religious Developments in Mid-Eighteenth-Century Britain and Ireland. War in History, 11(2), 125-147.

Dincecco, M., & Prado, M. (2012). Warfare, fiscal capacity and performance. Journal of Economic Growth, 17(3), 171-203. doi:10.1007/s10887-012-9079-4.

Farazmand, A. (2013). Conclusion: Can We Go Home? Roads Taken, Targets Met, and Lessons Learned on Governance and Organizational Eclecticism in the Public Arena. Public Organization Review, 13(2), 219-228.

Greimas, A. J. (1983). Structural Semantics: An Attempt at a Method, trans. D. McDowell, R. Schleifer and A. Velie. Lincoln (Nebraska): University of Nebraska Press.

Guentner, S., Lukes, S., Stanton, R., Vollmer, B. A., & Wilding, J. (2016). Bordering practices in the UK welfare system. Critical Social Policy, 36(3), 391-411.

Hebert, L., & Eveaert-Desmedt, N. (2011). Tools for text and image analysis: an introduction to applied semiotics. The Actantial Model (pp. 49-56). Quebec: Universite du Quebec a Rimouski.

Ilkowski, F. (2016). “New Warsaw Pacts”, “Beggar Imperialism” and interstate rivalry in Central and Eastern Europe. Capital & Class, 1–28. doi: 10.1177/0309816816678576.

Jensen, L. (2014). Representations of Sherlock Holmes. Denmark: Aalborg University.

Karnanta, K. Y. (2015). Perempuan Yang Mengundang Maut. Parafrase, 15(1), 17-26.

Lancho, M. C. (2013). Holmes and Watson or Sherlock and John : A homoerotic reading of Conan Doyle’ s Characters i n BBC’ s Sherlock . Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.

Moran, M. (2008). Representing the corporate elite in Britain: capitalist solidarity and capitalist legitimacy. Sociological Review, 56(1), 64-79.

Mubig, U. (2016). Juridification by Constitution; National Sovereignty in Eighteenth and and Nineteenth Century Europe. Studies in the History of Law and Justice, 6, 1-92.

Onodera, S. (2010). Greimas’s Actantial Model And The Cinderella Story: The Simplest Way For The Structural Analysis Of Narratives. Hirosaki (Japan): Hirosaki University. Retrieved from http://repository.ul.hirosaki-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10129/3788/1/JinbunShakaiRonso_J24_L13.pdf.

Paprotny, D. (2016). Measuring Central and Eastern Europe’s Socio-Economic Development Using Time Lags. Social Indicators Research, 127, 939-957.

Porter, L. (2012). Sherlock Holmes for the 21st century: essays on new adaptations. London: McFarland & Company, Inc.

Rakic, V. (2012). The Moral Identity of Europe: From Warfare and Civil Strife to “In Varietate Concordia.” International Journal for the Semiotic of Law, 25(2), 249-261.

Ritchie, G. (2011). Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows. United Kingdom, United States: Warner Bros Pictures.

Steiner, Z. (2003). Views of War: Britain before the “Great War” - and After. International Relations, 17(1), 7-33.

Stolze, T. (2005). Capital Limits to Liberal Democracy: A Response to John A. Berteaux. Human Rights Review, 96–100.

Tobin, V. (2006). Ways of Reading Sherlock Holmes: the Entrenchment of Discourse Blends. Language and Literature, 15(1), 73-90.

Turner, G. (2001). Film as social practice (Third). London and New York: Routledge.

Voruz, V. (2002). Soverignty, Power and Resistance. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 15(3), 231-252.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract 323  .
PDF downloaded 169  .