Filsafat Ilmu sebagai Landasan Holistis Pengembangan Ilmu Psikologi

Authors

  • Juneman Juneman Bina Nusantara University
  • Yosef Dedy Pradipto Bina Nusantara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v4i1.3462

Keywords:

philosophy, science, psychology, philosopher, psychologist

Abstract

Psychology has long been accepted by many scholars as a science. Nevertheless, intensive readings on philosophy of science and psychology in Indonesia are rarely found. Meanwhile, there are not many professional psychologists nor psychology scientists deliver a course on Philosophy of Science in the faculties and study programs of psychology. The common argument proposed is that both psychologists and lecturers on psychology are not well qualified nor confident enough to teach the Philosophy of Science subject, as if the subject "is only taught" by philosophers or alumni of philosophy department. This phenomenon depicts that there are two worlds: the psychology world and the "other world", philosophy. This straight differentiation is certainly both unnecessary and dangerous as philosophy of science is indeed inherent in any psychological discussions. This article proposed that philosophy of science is a holistic base for the development of psychology and that the relationship between philosophy of science and psychology is close and tight. Psychologists are expected to take more part in inquiring assumptions and values in psychology and thus the simplification of psychology as a technical psychodiagnostic could be avoided.

 

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

References

Alsa, A. (2003). Pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif serta kombinasinya dalam penelitian psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Alwasilah, A. C. (2002). Pokoknya kualitatif. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

Baird, F. E., & Kaufmann, W. (2008). From Plato to Derrida. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Bertens, K. (1992). Umat Katolik dan bioetika. Dalam Magnis-Suseno, F., Lajar, L. L., Bertens, K., Bagus, L., & Mardiatmadja, B. S., Iman dan ilmu: Refleksi iman atas masalah-masalah aktual. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Bertens, K. (2001). Etika. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Bertens, K. (2005). Panorama filsafat modern (Edisi revisi). Jakarta: Teraju.

Bunge, M. A. (1983). Epistemology & methodology. Hingham, MA: Reidel.

Christensen, C. M., Johnson, C., & Horn, M. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281-302.

Hudgens, S., Dineen, K., Webster, K., Lai, J. S., & Cella, D. (2004). Assessing statistically and clinically meaningful construct deficiency/saturation: Recommended criteria for content coverage and item writing. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 17(4). Ditemukembali pada 7 November 2009, dari http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt174.pdf

Kantor, J. R. (1983). Axioms and their role in psychology. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 7(1), 5-11.

Kebung, K. (2002, Januari-Februari). Kembalinya moral melalui seks. Basis, No. 01-02, Th. 51, 32-41.

Kerlinger, F. N. (2003). Asas-asas penelitian behavioral. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Lakatos, I. (1978). Mathematics, science and epistemology. Philosophical Papers, 2.

Leahy, L. (1997). Sains dan agama dalam konteks zaman ini. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Leahy, L. (2002). Horizon manusia: Dari pengetahuan ke kebijaksanaan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Leksono, K. (2002, Januari-Februari). Berakhirnya manusia dan kebangkrutan ilmu-ilmu. Basis, No. 01-02, Th. 51, 22-31.

Magnis-Suseno, F. (1995). Filsafat-kebudayaan-politik: Butir-butir pemikiran kritis. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Marzoeki, D. (2000). Budaya ilmiah dan filsafat ilmu. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Mustansyir, R, & Munir, M. (2001). Filsafat ilmu. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Pomeory, L. (2005). The new science of axiological psychology. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Ruben, D. (1990). Explaining explanation. London & New York: Routledge.

Sarwono, S. W. (Ed.) (2002). Teori-teori psikologi sosial (Edisi revisi). Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Scientific explanation. (2009, 16 Januari). Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ditemukembali pada 7 November 2009, dari http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-explanation/

Singarimbun. M., & Effendi, S. (Ed.) (2006). Metode penelitian survai (Edisi revisi). Jakarta: LP3ES.

Smith, E. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2000). Social psychology. Psychology Press.

Suriasumanti, J. (Ed.) (1997). Ilmu dalam perspektif: Sebuah kumpulan karangan tentang hakekat ilmu. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Suriasumantri, J. (2000). Filsafat ilmu: Sebuah pengantar populer. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Takwin, B. (2003). Filsafat Timur: Sebuah pengantar ke pemikiran-pemikiran Timur. Yogyakarta & Bandung: Jalasutra.

Tennant, F. R. (1968). Philosophical theology. London, N.W.: Cambridge University Press.

Wilardjo. L. (1997). Ilmu dan humaniora. Dalam Suriasumanti, J. (Ed.), Ilmu dalam perspektif: Sebuah kumpulan karangan tentang hakekat ilmu. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2013-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract 1273  .
PDF downloaded 2418  .