The Changes of Students’ Toefl Score After One Year Learning

Authors

  • Ienneke Indra Dewi Bina Nusantara University
  • Darna Darna Bina Nusantara University
  • Djuria Suprato Bina Nusantara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v6i4.3379

Keywords:

English competence, TOEFL scores, Self Access Language Learning Center

Abstract

BINUS students are supposed to increase their English competence indicated by their TOEFL scores. This paper aims to observe the differences between studens TOEFL scores obtained when they entered BINUS and the scores after they joined TOEFL courses at BINUS for one year. The participants were 121 students. The data for the entrance test were taken from the BINUS data center and the final test data were taken from their final test at English class. The data were analysed using statistics especially the descriptive statistics, comparing means, and correlation. To support the quantative data, a set of questionnaires was distributed to those 121 students. The results show that the students’ TOEFL scores have increased significantly in the final test compared to those in the entrance test. The low achiever students showed a better performance than the higher ones. Students’ motivation and background support their English study. Students proved to have the most problem in listening. The results of the research are expected to be the input for English lecturers to improve their teaching especially the existence of SALLC (Self Access Language Learning Center).

 

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

Author Biographies

Ienneke Indra Dewi, Bina Nusantara University

English Department, Faculty of Humanities

Darna Darna, Bina Nusantara University

English Department, Faculty of Humanities

Djuria Suprato, Bina Nusantara University

English Department, Faculty of Humanities

References

Carson, J. E., Carrell, P. L., Silberstein, S., Kroll, B., & Kuehn, P. A. (1990). Reading writing relationships in first and second language. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 245–266.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analyss for behavioural sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

ETS (n.d.). TOEFL iBT Tests and TOEFL PBT Tests. Retrieved March 23 2013 from http://www.ets.org/s/toefl/pdf.

Phillips, D. (2008). Long Preparation Course for the TOEFL Test IBT . New York: Longman.

Purwanto, N. (1996). Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Slameto (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sugiarto, S. (2012, January 14). Do TOEFL Scores Reflect English Proficiency? Retrieved Maret 2013, 23 from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2012/01/14/do-toefl-scores-reflect-English-proficiency.html.

Uyanto, S. S. (2009). Pedoman Analisis Data dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Wait, I. W., & Gressel. (2009). Relationship Between TOEFL Score and Academic Success for International Engineering Students. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 389–398.

Yi-Ting, C., & Chen-Chen, S. (2006). Language Proficiency and Academic Performance. PAAL 11 (Pan-Pasific Association of Applied Linguistics) (pp. 58–72). Retrieved from http://www.paaljapan.org/resources/proceedings/PAAL11/pdfs/05.pdf

Downloads

Published

2015-10-30

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract 338  .
PDF downloaded 216  .