Which Teacher-Student Interaction Triggers Students’ Uptake

Authors

  • Clara Herlina Karjo Bina Nusantara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v6i3.3361

Keywords:

focus on form, reactive, pre-emptive, feedback, uptake

Abstract

The pattern of interaction between the teacher and the students will determine the students’ uptake (i.e. the students’ incorporating correction into an utterance of their own). This paper examines the type of teacher-student interaction which will likely trigger the students’ uptake. The data was taken from the recordings of 10 non-native English lessons at university level and different types of subjects (literature, grammar, discourse, semantics, and classroom management). 500 minutes of lessons were transcribed and 50 focus on form episodes were chosen to be analyzed. The study revealed that the dominant type of interaction was reactive focus on form which was followed by metalinguistic feedback.

 

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

Author Biography

Clara Herlina Karjo, Bina Nusantara University

English Department, Faculty of Humanities

References

Barnes, D. (1992). From communication to curriculum. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.

Cazden, C.(1988). Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Portsmouth: Heineman.

Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51(2), 281–318.

Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S.(2001). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 407–432.

Hall, J. K., & Walsh, M. (2002). Teacher-student interaction and language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22 , 186–203.

Hee Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research 8(3), 263–300.

Lee, W., & Ng, S. (2010). Reducing student reticence through teacher interaction strategy. ELT Journal Volume, 64(3), 302–313.

Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in languageRese teaching methodology. In K. d. Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch, Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (p. 39 52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 51–81.

Tsang, W. K. (2004). Feedback and uptake in teacher-student interaction: an analysis of 18 English lessons in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. RELC 35(2), 187–209.

Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education 5, 1–17.

Downloads

Published

2015-07-30

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract 395  .
PDF downloaded 212  .