Analisa Efektifitas Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris antara Metode In-Class dengan Metode Self Learning dengan Media Komputer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v2i1.3058Keywords:
self learning, instructor based learning, training programAbstract
The purpose of this study was to measure the effectiveness of learning English between the methods in-class with a method of self-learning using computer aids and operational support staff in an international school. The research method used is descriptive method with a final score comparing between learning results and analyze how the increased English proficiency. A gap still exists in terms of English language proficiency for the operational support staff, we conducted this training program in the classroom with instructors as mentors and teachers in the learning process. And due to busy work schedules and shift changes are different, this learning program made independently by using a computer. The participants who experienced an increase in value is only one person or 6.67%. With these results it may be concluded that a training program with the guidance of instructors in the classroom are more effective and successful in providing a better ability than the self-learning program with the help of computers. Things that affect, among others, are motivation to learn, as seen from the low frequency of attendance at the laboratory (average 93.33% attendance below the required number of attendance), for participants with secondary education level and lower, self-study programs does not seem to be effective, and computer media can not replace the function of a mentor or teacher.
Plum Analytics
References
Briggs, L.J. (ed.) (1977). Instructional Design: Principles and Applications New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.
DePorter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2000). Quantum Learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
Gage, N.L., Barliner, D. C. (1977). Educational Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Hollenbeck, G. P. (2008) Executive selection—What’s right...and what’s wrong. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Perspective on Science and Practice. Vol 2(2), Jun 2009, 130-143.
Noe, R. A. (2008). Employee Training and Development, 4th Edition. Irwin.
Robert, J. P. (2002). Dictionaire Pratique de Didactique du FLE. Paris: OPHRYS.
Sadiman, A, & Raharjo, R. (2002) Media Pendidikan: Pengertian, Pengembangan dan Pemanfaatannya. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Schultz, D., & Schultz, S. E. (2006), Psychology & Work Today, Ninth Edition, Pearson.
Soekartiwi (1996). Rancangan Instruksional. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sumitro et. al. (2004). Pengantar Ilmu Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: FIB UNY.
Ur, P. (1988). Grammar Practice Activities. New York: Cambridge University Press
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)