Kondisi Manajemen Pengetahuan Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di DKI Jakarta

Dyah Budiastuti

doi:10.21512/bbr.v4i1.1058

Authors

Dyah Budiastuti Bina Nusantara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v4i1.1058

Keywords:

knowledge management, knowledge management implementation

Abstract

Globalization affects not only economic sector, but also education sector especially higher education. It changes the mindset on managing university as higher education executant which is responsible in producing science and technology. As an organization focusing on human capital, a university should have ability in knowledge management. This research aims to determine the conditions of knowledge management on private
universities in Jakarta, and to propose the implementations of knowledge management which could create value. The study was conducted on 184 private universities in Jakarta with descriptive statistical analysis methods. The results showed that the conditions of knowledge management on the universities have not been able to create value for the universities concerned. So that, the implementations should be linked to the provision of knowledge management components, such as the provision of information technology, the process management, and the
provision/improvization on human capital capability in managing knowledge management systems.

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

Author Biography

Dyah Budiastuti, Bina Nusantara University

Management Department

References

Azahari, A. (2000). Dampak Globalisasi di Pendidikan Tinggi – untuk mengantisipasi tahun 2020. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. No.23 tahun ke 6.

Cooper, Donald R. Pamela S Shindler. (2008). Business Research Methods. Mc.Grawhill. Int.

Debowski, S. (2006). Knowledge Management. Australia: John Wiley & Sons.

Duderstadt, J. J. (2002) A University for the 21st Century. The University of Michigan Press.

Indrajit, R. E., dan Djokopranoto, R. (2006). Manajemen Perguruan Tinggi Modern. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Jennex, M. E. (2008), Knowledge Management Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Apllication. Information Science reference Hersley, New York.

Ju, T. L., Li, Y., Chia, dan Shiang Lee, Tien. (2006). A contingency model for knowledge management capability and innovation.

Industrial Management & Data Systems Vol. 106 No. 6,pp. 855-877 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited 0263-5577.

Kidwell, J. J., Linde, V., Karen M., and Johnson, S. L. (2001). Applying Corporate Knowledge Management Practices in Higher Education." In Bernbom, Gerald, editor, Information Alchemy: The Art and Science of Knowledge Management. EDUCAUSE Leadership Series #3. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. pp. 1-24.

Lind, D. A., et all. (2007). Statistical Techniques in Business and economic with Global Data Sets, Mc. Graw Hill.

Lustri, D. (2007). Knowledge Management Model: Practical Application for Competency Development. Emerald Group Publishing limited 0969-6474, Vol 14 No.2.

Malhotra, K. N. (2010). Marketing Research an Applied Orientation. Prentice Hall.

Miller, B. A. (2007). Assesing Organizational Performance in Higher Education. John Wiley & Son.

Prabowo, H. (2003). Analisis Struktur Persaingan Industri Jasa Pendidikan Tinggi Komputer untuk Menentukan Model Bersaing, Laporan Penelitian Hibah Universitas Bina Nusantara.

Roos, J. dan Von Krogh, G. (1996). The Epistemological Challenge: Managing Knowledge and Intelectual Capital. European Management Journal. Vol. 14, Issue 4, August,1996, p.333.

Sekaran, U. (2010). Research Methods for Business. US: John Wiley & Sons.

Tiwana, A. (2002). The Knowledge Management Toolkit: Practical Techniques for Building a Knowledge Management System. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Tobing, P. L. (2007). Knowledge Management: Konsep, Arsitektur, dan Implementasi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Zuhal. (2010). Knowledge & Innovation: Platform Kekuatan Daya Saing. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.