Nonlinear Split-Plot Design Model in Parameters Estimation using Estimated Generalized Least Square - Maximum Likelihood Estimation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v9i2.4703Keywords:
Split-plot design, parameters estimation, Estimated Generalized Least Square, Maximum Likelihood EstimationAbstract
This research aimed to provide a theoretical framework for intrinsically nonlinear models with two additive error terms. To achieve this, an iterative Gauss-Newton via Taylor Series expansion procedures for Estimated Generalized Least Square (EGLS) technique was adopted. This technique was applied in estimating the parameters of an intrinsically nonlinear split-plot design model where the variance components were unknown. The unknown variance components were estimated via Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) method. To achieve the numerical stability in the iterative process of estimating the parameters, Householder QR decomposition was used. The results show that EGLS method presented in this research is available and applicable to estimate linear fixed, random, and mixed-effect models. However, in practical situations, the functional form of the mean in the model is often nonlinear due to the dynamics involved in the system process.
Plum Analytics
References
Anderson, M. J. (2016). Design of Experiments (DOE): How to handle hard-to-change factors using a split plot. Chemical Engineering, 123(9), 12-1-12-5.
Anderson, M. J., & Whitcomb, P. J. (2014). Employing power to ‘right-size’ design of experiments. ITEA Journal, 35(March), 40-44.
Anderson-Cook, C. M., Borror, C. M., & Montgomery, D. C. (2009). Response surface design evaluation and comparison. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 139(2), 629-641.
Blankenship, E. E., Stroup, W. W., Evans, S. P., & Knezevic, S. Z. (2003). Statistical inference for calibration points in nonlinear mixed effects models. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental
Statistics, 8(4), 455- 468.
Gao, H., Yang, F., & Shi, L. (2017). Split plot design and data analysis in SAS. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1834, No. 1, p. 030024). AIP Publishing.
Gumpertz, M. L., & Rawlings, J. O. (1992). Nonlinear regression with variance components: Modeling effects of ozone on crop yield. Crop Science, 32(1), 219-224.
Hasegawa, Y., Ikeda, S., Matsuura, S., & Suzuki, H. (2010). A study on methodology for total design management (the 4th report): A study on the response surface method for split-plot designs using the
generalized least squares. In Proceedings of the 92nd JSQC technical conference (pp. 235-238). Tokyo: The Japanese society for quality control.
Hemmerle, W. J., & Hartley, H. O. (1973). Computing maximum likelihood estimates for the mixed AOV model using the W transformation. Technometrics, 15(4), 819-831.
Hinkelmann, K., & Kempthrone, O. (2007). Design and analysis of experiments, volume 1: Introduction to experimental design (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Ikeda, S., Matsuura, S., & Suzuki, H. (2014). Two-step residual-based estimation of error variances for generalized least squares in split-plot experiments. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and
Computation, 43(2), 342-358.
Jones, B., & Goos, P. (2012). I-optimal versus D-optimal split-plot response surface designs. Journal of Quality Technology, 44(2), 85-101.
Jones, B., & Nachtsheim, C. J. (2009). Split plot designs: What, why, and how. Journal of Quality Technology, 41(4), 340-361.
Klotz, J. H. (2006). A computational approach to statistics. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., Blankenship, E. E., Van Acker, R. C., & Lindquist, J. L. (2002). Critical period for weed control: The concept and data analysis. Weed Science, 50(6), 773-786.
Kulahci, M., & Menon, A. (2017). Trellis plots as visual aids for analyzing split plot experiments. Quality Engineering, 29(2), 211-225.
Lu, L., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2012). Rethinking the optimal response surface design for a first-order model with two-factor interactions, when protecting against curvature. Quality Engineering, 24(3), 404-422.
Lu, L., & Anderson‐Cook, C. M. (2014). Balancing multiple criteria incorporating cost using Pareto front optimization for split‐plot designed experiments. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 30(1), 37-55.
Lu, L., Anderson-Cook, C. M., & Robinson, T. J. (2011). Optimization of designed experiments based on multiple criteria utilizing a Pareto frontier. Technometrics, 53(4), 353-365.
Lu, L., Anderson-Cook, C. M., & Robinson, T. J. (2012). A case study to demonstrate a Pareto Frontier for selecting a best response surface design while simultaneously optimizing multiple criteria. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 28(3),
-221.
Lu, L., Robinson, T. J., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2014). A case study to select an optimal split-plot design for a mixture-process experiment based on multiple objectives. Quality Engineering, 26(4), 424-439.
Milliken, G. A., & Johnson, D. E. (2009). Analysis of messy data: Designed experiments (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Montgomery, D. C. (2008). Design and analysis of experiments (7th ed.). Wiley.
Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2009). Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments (3rd ed.). USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Rasch, D., & Masata, O. (2006). Methods of variance component estimation. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 51(6), 227-235.
Wang, L., Kowalski, S. M., & Vining, G. G. (2009). Orthogonal blocking of response surface split-plot designs. Journal of Applied Statistics, 36(3), 303-321.
Weerakkody, G. J., & Johnson, D. E. (1992). Estimation of within model parameters in regression models with a nested error structure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(419), 708-713.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows:
