Perception Analysis of Desktop and Mobile Service Website
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v7i4.3753Keywords:
perception analysis, desktop website, mobile website, webqual, user perceptionAbstract
The research was conducted as a qualitative study of the website to deeper explore and examine the analysis of user perception of desktop and mobile website services. This research reviewed about user perception of desktop and mobile service website used by using qualitative methods adapted to WebQual and User Experience approach. This qualitative research refered to the theoretical reference written by Creswell (2014). The expected outcome is to know the user perceptions of the available services and information in the website along with the possibility of desktop and mobile gap arising from differences in the two services. These results can be used as a service model on the website of the user experience.Plum Analytics
References
Altaboli, A., & Lin, Y. (2011). Objective and subjective measures of visual aesthetics and user of website interface design: The two side of the coin. Human Computer Interaction, Lecture Nototes in Computer Science, 6761, 35-44.
Barnes, S., & Vidgen, R. (2002). An integrative approach to the assessment of e-commerce. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research,3(3), 114-127.
Barnes, S., & Vidgen, R. (2006). Data triangulation and web quality metrics: A case study in egovernment. Information and Management, 43(6), 767-777.
Chang, H., & Wang., H. (2011). The marketing effect of customer perceived value on online shopping behavior. Online Information Review, 35(3), 333-359.
Chen, C., & Cheng, C. (2013). How online and offline behavior processes affect each other: Customer behavior in a cyber enhanced bookstore. Quality and Quantity Journal, 47(5), 2539-2555.
Conger, S. E. (2012). Service quality measurement: Past and future. In Special Interest Group on Services associated with the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS SIGSVC).
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed). California: Sage Publications Inc.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of MIS, 19(4), 9–30.
Farida, S. I., Nuryuliani, & Hermana, B. (2014). A review of empirical research on website quality measurement model based on consumer’s perception. In International Conference on Internet Studies, August 16-17, 2014, Singapore.
Forum.detik.com. (2012). Retrieved on January 10, 2015 from forum.detik.com/iklan-detiknewsmengganggu-sekali-t397596
Maurer, M. E., & Al, E. (2010). Mobile or desktop websites?: Website usage on multi touch devices. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (pp. 739-742). ACM.
Mifsud, J. (2011). The difference (and relationship) between usability and user experience. Retrieved from http://usabilitygeek.com/the-difference-between-usability-and-user-experience/
Norman, D. A. (2005). There is an automobile in HCI’s future in interactions. Retrieved from http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/theres_an_automobil.html 306 ComTech Vol. 7 No. 4 December 2016: 295-306
Okene, D. E., & Enukpere, V. E. (2011). Comparative Analysis of the Usability of Academic Websites of Delta State Polytechnics. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences (JETEAS), 2(6), 1042-1046.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. The Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows:
