Penerapan Metode Ahp untuk Subsistem Pendukung Pemilihan Supplier pada Outhouse Costing Integrated System (Ocis) di Pt Adm


  • Surja Surjandy Bina Nusantara University
  • Melva Melva Bina Nusantara University



DSS, AHP, Purchasing


In general automotive development, especially car, PT Astra Daihatsu Motor (ADM) continuously improves quality and service to supply vehicles in Indonesia. To support the improvement of quality and service, PT ADM continues to improve technology-based system to assist in providing vehicle parts of production process requirements. Therefore Purchasing division is very important in this process. Besides, supplier is a very important role in making and supplying parts for the company. PT ADM has a new system used to improve bidding process. Based on the discussion, price was not the only thing significant. There were other things to consider, especially in selecting the right supplier.  Realizing the system does not cover all areas, therefore, it needs Decision Support System with AHP method to filter suppliers. So that, the company will automatically have good supplier. At least, the supplier meets company standard, especially purchasing department. This research concludes that using AHP Method is very effective for filtering supplier so that the company can make sure that only capable supplier or supplier which meets company standard may join the tender to supply the goods or parts. This paper combined AHP Methodology as the first selection using pairwise scoring and Analysis Sensitivity Methodology used to take decision which supplier is in line with project requirements.


Plum Analytics


Anonim. (2011). Company Profile of PT Astra Daihatsu Motor.

Adiwiguna, N. (2012). Sosialisasi OCIS Okt-Nov 2012. Jakarta.

Chamodraks, I., Batis, D., and Martakos, D. (2010). Supplier selection in electronic marketplaces using satisficing and fuzzy AHP. Elsevier Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 490-498.

Choi, T.Y, and Hartley, J. L. (1996). An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain. Journal of Operation Management, 14, 333-343.

Dobrica, L. & Niemela, E. (2002, Jul). A Survey on software architecture analysis methods. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28(7), 638-653.

Fun dan Hung. (1997). A new measure for supplier performance evaluation. IIE Transactions, 29(9), 753-758.

GAWS Inti Solusi. (2011). OCIS Manual Desktop v1.2. Jakarta: GAWS Inti Solusi.

Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision Making for Leaders of the AHP Series.Vol. II.

Svahnberg, M., et al. (2003). A quality-driven decision-support method for identifying software architecture candidates. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 13(5), 547-573.

Ting, Shin-Chan. (2008). An Integrated Approach for Supplier Selection and Purchasing Decisions. VOl. XIII, 116-127.

Zhu, Liming. Aybuke Aurum. Ian Gorton. Ross Jeffery. (2005). Tradeoff and Sensitivity Analysis in Software Architecture Evaluation Using Analytical Hierarchy Process, 13, 357-375.






Abstract 302  .
PDF downloaded 213  .