Prediction of Transportation-Induced Physiological Stress in Cattle Using an Artificial Neural Network

Authors

  • Harry Dhika IPB University
  • Agus Buono IPB University
  • Shelvie Nidya Neyman IPB University
  • Dewi Apri Astuti IPB University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v17i2.14254

Keywords:

neural network, physiological stress, cattle transport, livestock welfare, data augmentation

Abstract

The transportation of cattle, particularly during peak demand periods such as Eid al-Adha, frequently induces physiological stress that compromises animal welfare, reduces productivity, and causes economic losses. This study proposes an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model to evaluate and predict cattle performance following transport stress using pre- and post-transport physiological indicators, including rectal temperature, heart rate, respiration rate, and blood metabolites (glucose and creatinine). The original dataset comprised 184 samples collected from Peranakan Ongole (PO) cattle across five regions in Indonesia; due to class imbalance among performance categories (Increase, Stable, Decrease), biologically informed data augmentation was applied, expanding the dataset to 1,084 samples. Feature selection via Pearson correlation identified respiration rate, heart rate, and musculoskeletal indicators as the most predictive variables. Model training and validation were conducted using a train–test split strategy, with performance evaluated based on accuracy, recall, and F1-score. The ANN architecture employed ReLU activation, Adam optimization, L2 regularization, and dropout to prevent overfitting. Trained and validated on the augmented dataset, the model achieved 96% accuracy and consistently high F1-scores (0.96 macro average) across all three classes. The results demonstrate robust predictive performance in capturing complex, non-linear physiological stress patterns associated with transportation within the studied dataset, particularly in detecting performance decline. In practice, this approach lays the groundwork for intelligent early warning systems that enable data-driven assessment of livestock condition, thereby supporting welfare-oriented decision-making in commercial cattle transportation systems.

Dimensions

Author Biography

Harry Dhika, IPB University

Department of Sience School of Information Systems

References

Abubakar, A. A., Zulkifli, I., Goh, Y. M., Kaka, U., Sabow, A. B., Awad, E. A., Imlan, J. C., Othman, A. H., Raghazli, R., Mitin, H., & Sazili, A. Q. (2021). The effects of stocking density and distances on electroencephalographic changes and cortisol as welfare indicators in brahman crossbred cattle. Animals, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102895

Badali, M. R. A., Rizal, M., Riyadhi, M., & Sumantri, I. (2023). The physiological influence of dairy cows on controlled environmental conditions. Journal of Wetland Animal Husbandry Research, 3(2), 18–23.

Cantalapiedra-Hijar, G., Nedelkov, K., Crosson, P., & McGee, M. (2024). Some plasma biomarkers of residual feed intake in beef cattle remain consistent regardless of intake level. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59253-7

Damtew, A. (2018). The Effect of long Distance Transportation Stress on Cattle: a Review. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 3(3), 3304–3308. https://doi.org/10.26717/bjstr.2018.03.000908

Dineva, K., & Atanasova, T. (2023). and Data Management on AWS Cloud.

Ding, L., Zhang, C., Yue, Y., Yao, C., Li, Z., Hu, Y., Yang, B., Ma, W., Yu, L., Gao, R., & Li, Q. (2025). Wearable Sensors-Based Intelligent Sensing and Application of Animal Behaviors: A Comprehensive Review. Sensors, 25(14), 4515. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25144515

Edwards-Callaway, L., Rimm-Kaufman, D., & Loh, H. Y. (2026). A systematic mapping review of cattle welfare research during road transportation (2015-2025). Journal of Animal Science, 104(Fao 2025). https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag218

FAO. (2023). Livestock transportation and slaughter practices. In Livestock transportation and slaughter practices. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc6002en

Georgiades, P., Economou, T., Proestos, Y., Araya, J., Lelieveld, J., & Neira, M. (2024). The Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to the Global Forecast of Temperature-Humidity Index with High Temporal Resolution. Earth System Science Data Discussions, 2024(August), 1–15.

Ghezzi, M. D., Napolitano, F., Casas-Alvarado, A., Hernández-Ávalos, I., Domínguez-Oliva, A., Olmos-Hernández, A., & Pereira, A. M. F. (2024). Utilization of Infrared Thermography in Assessing Thermal Responses of Farm Animals under Heat Stress. Animals, 14(4), 616. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14040616

Grzesiak, W., Zaborski, D., Pluciński, M., Jędrzejczak-Silicka, M., Pilarczyk, R., & Sablik, P. (2025). The Use of Selected Machine Learning Methods in Dairy Cattle Farming: A Review. Animals, 15(14), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142033

Habeeb, A. A., Osman, S. F., Teama, F. E. I., & Gad, A. E. (2023). The detrimental impact of high environmental temperature on physiological response, growth, milk production, and reproductive efficiency of ruminants. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 55(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03805-y

Handayani, T., Permata, E., & Gunawan, S. (2024). Integration of Non-invasive Physiological Markers with Artificial Intelligence for Assessing Cattle Welfare. Sensors and Biosystems Research, 15(3), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.3390/sbr.2024.98765

Islam, M. N., Edwards, J. L., Burns, R., Qi, H., & Gan, H. (2026). Computer Vision for Cattle Health and Welfare Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review of Methods, Applications, and Interdisciplinary Integration in Smart Agriculture. Sensors, 26(13), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26134271

Kaur, D. (2025). Smart neck collar: IoT-based disease detection and health monitoring for dairy cows. Discover Internet of Things. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43926-025-00109-5

Kumar, P., Ahmed, M. A., Abubakar, A. A., Hayat, M. N., Kaka, U., Ajat, M., Goh, Y. M., & Sazili, A. Q. (2023). Improving animal welfare status and meat quality through assessment of stress biomarkers: A critical review. Meat Science, 197, 109048. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEATSCI.2022.109048

Menezes, G. L., Mazon, G., Ferreira, R. E. P., Cabrera, V. E., & Dorea, J. R. R. (2024). Artificial intelligence for livestock: a narrative review of the applications of computer vision systems and large language models for animal farming. Animal Frontiers, 14(6), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfae048

Reitelseder, S., Tranberg, B., Agergaard, J., Dideriksen, K., Højfeldt, G., Merry, M. E., Storm, A. C., Poulsen, K. R., Hansen, E. T., van Hall, G., Lund, P., & Holm, L. (2020). Phenylalanine stable isotope tracer labeling of cow milk and meat and human experimental applications to study dietary protein-derived amino acid availability. Clinical Nutrition, 39(12), 3652–3662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2020.03.017

Santoso, K., Tarigan, A. F., & Komariah. (2023). Physiological response of broilers to water misting using sprinkler water. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 28(3), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.18343/jipi.28.3.423

Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S., Faucitano, L., Dadgar, S., Crowe, T., & González, L. A. (2021). Road transport of cattle, swine, and poultry in North America and its impact on animal welfare, carcass and meat quality: A review. Livestock Science, 249, 104499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104499

Slayi, M., & Jaja, I. F. (2025). Strategies for mitigating heat stress and their effects on behavior, physiological indicators, and growth performance in communally managed feedlot cattle. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 12(February), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1513368

Thornton, P., Nelson, G., Mayberry, D., & Herrero, M. (2022). Impacts of heat stress on global cattle production during the 21st century: a modelling study. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(3), e192–e201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00002-X

Yu, Z., Han, Y., Cha, L., Chen, S., Wang, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Design of an intelligent wearable device for real-time cattle health monitoring. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 11(November), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1441960

Downloads

Published

2026-09-29

How to Cite

Dhika, H., Buono, A., Neyman, S. N., & Astuti, D. A. (2026). Prediction of Transportation-Induced Physiological Stress in Cattle Using an Artificial Neural Network. ComTech: Computer, Mathematics and Engineering Applications, 17(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v17i2.14254
Abstract 46  .
PDF downloaded 59  .