The Effect of Digital Leadership, Technological Capability, and Collaborative Innovation Capability on Institution Core Performance Mediated by Open Innovation in Indonesian Higher Education Institutions

Johan Johan; Fergyanto E. Gunawan; Rano Kartono Rahim; Mohammad Hamsal

Authors

Johan Bina Nusantara University
Fergyanto E. Gunawan Bina Nusantara University
Rano Kartono Rahim Bina Nusantara University
Mohammad Hamsal Bina Nusantara University

Keywords:

Institutional performance, Open Innovation, Technological Capability, Digital Leadership, Collaborative Innovation Capabilities

Abstract

The higher education sector in Indonesia faces significant challenges, including a quality gap in university outcomes, increased competition, and rapid technological advancement. These conditions require Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) to enhance their core performance through strategic capabilities. The research aims to analyze the influence of Digital Leadership (DL), Technological Capability (TC), and Collaborative Innovation Capability (CIC) on Institution Core Performance (ICP), mediated by Open Innovation (OI). The novelty lies in its focus on performance quality within Indonesian HEIs and the comprehensive mechanism through which capabilities drive OI, which subsequently enhances institutional performance. Methodologically, the research adopts a quantitative approach using an explanatory survey design. The sample consists of 42 leaders from private HEIs in LLDIKTI Region III holding "Excellent (A)" and "Very Good (B)" accreditation, selected through simple random sampling. Data are analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) with SmartPLS software.The results reveal several key findings. TC emerges as the most dominant factor, significantly driving OI and serving as a strong predictor of ICP. DL, while positively associated with OI and TC, shows no significant direct or indirect effect on ICP, as its effectiveness depends on alignment with a broader innovation strategy. CIC plays an essential indirect role by strengthening TC, which in turn enhances ICP through improved OI implementation. Overall, optimal institutional performance depends primarily on a strong TC foundation, supported by an integrated OI approach, with DL and CIC acting as key enablers.

Dimensions

Author Biographies

Johan, Bina Nusantara University

Management Department, BINUS Business School Doctor of Research in Management

Fergyanto E. Gunawan, Bina Nusantara University

Industrial Engineering Department, BINUS Graduate Program - Master of Industrial Engineering

Rano Kartono Rahim, Bina Nusantara University

Management Department, BINUS Business School Doctor of Research in Management

Mohammad Hamsal, Bina Nusantara University

Management Department, BINUS Business School Doctor of Research in Management

References

[1] Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Kemendikbud RI, “Buku panduan Merdeka Belajar - Kampus Merdeka. Manual,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://repositori.kemendikdasmen.go.id/18005/

[2] H. Chesbrough, “Twenty years of open innovation,” MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 1–3, 2024.

[3] A. Valencia-Arias, L. G´omez-Bayona, G. Moreno-L´opez, N. Sialer-Rivera, O.-V. Bernal, A. Gallegos, and F. J. Arias-Vargas, “Research trends around open innovation in higher education: Advancements and future direction,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 8, pp. 1–12, 2023.

[4] S. A. Zahra, “The resource-based view, resourcefulness, and resource management in startup firms: A proposed research agenda,” Journal of Management, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1841–1860, 2021.

[5] P. W. Beamish and D. Chakravarty, “Using the resource-based view in multinational enterprise research,” Journal of Management, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1861–1877, 2021.

[6] L. Iruthayasamy, “The resource-based view,” in Understanding business strategy: Confusion and consensus. Springer, 2021, pp. 63–74.

[7] C. J. Collins, “Expanding the resource based view model of strategic human resource management,” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 331–358, 2021.

[8] T. Pianese, “Interpreting sports events from a resource-based view perspective,” International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 240–261, 2021.

[9] B. Wernerfelt, “A resource-based view of the firm,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 171–180, 1984.

[10] D. J. Teece, G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 509–533, 1997.

[11] R. van de Wetering, P. Mikalef, and A. Pateli, “Strategic alignment between IT flexibility and dynamic capabilities: An empirical investigation,” International Journal of IT/Business Alignment and Governance (IJITBAG), vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2018.

[12] J. M. Torrez, “Dynamic strategic and organizational capabilities,” Global Journal of Management and Business Research, vol. 21, no. A7, pp. 5–14, 2021.

[13] A. Rotjanakorn, P. Sadangharn, and K. Na-Nan, “Development of dynamic capabilities for automotive industry performance under disruptive innovation,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1–19, 2020.

[14] W. H. Murphy and G. A. Wilson, “Dynamic capabilities and stakeholder theory explanation of superior performance among award-winning hospitals,” International Journal of Healthcare Management, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 211–219, 2022.

[15] P. Deng, Y. Liu, V. C. Gallagher, and X. Wu, “International strategies of emerging market multinationals: A dynamic capabilities perspective,” Journal of Management & Organization, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 408–425, 2020.

[16] J. Sengupta, Theory of innovation: A new paradigm of growth. Springer, 2014.

[17] E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster, 2003.

[18] Y. Wang, D. Hong, and J. Huang, “A diffusion of innovation perspective for digital transformation on education,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 225, pp. 2439–2448, 2023.

[19] L. M. D. Araujo, S. Priadana, V. Paramarta, and D. Sunarsi, “Digital leadership in business organizations: An overview,” International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 2021.

[20] A. T¨urk, “Digital leadership role in developing business strategy suitable for digital transformation,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, pp. 1–11, 2023.

[21] T. J. J. Brunner, T. Schuster, and C. Lehmann, “Leadership’s long arm: The positive influence of digital leadership on managing technology-driven change over a strengthened service innovation capacity,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, pp. 1–24, 2023.

[22] M. M. Magesa and J. Jonathan, “Conceptualizing digital leadership characteristics for successful digital transformation: The case of Tanzania,” Information Technology for Development, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 777–796, 2022.

[23] F. B. Tigre, C. Curado, and P. L. Henriques, “Digital leadership: A bibliometric analysis,” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 40–70, 2023.

[24] S. Khin and T. C. F. Ho, “Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: A mediating role of digital innovation,” International Journal of Innovation Science, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 177–195, 2019.

[25] X. Su, C. Mou, and S. Zhou, “Institutional environment, technological innovation capability and service-oriented transformation,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–24, 2023.

[26] K. S. R. Warner and M. W¨ager, “Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal,” Long Range Planning, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 326–349, 2019.

[27] H. Liu, W. Ke, K. K. Wei, and Z. Hua, “The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: The mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1452–1462, 2013.

[28] W. Zhang, Y. Jiang, and W. Zhang, “Capabilities for collaborative innovation of technological alliance: A knowledge-based view,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1734–1744, 2019.

[29] A. Pigola, P. R. Da Costa, M. R. Mazzieri, and I. C. Scafuto, “Collaborative innovation: A technological perspective,” International Journal of Innovation: IJI Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 204–211, 2022.

[30] M. Daradkeh, “Business analytics and collaborative innovation performance in the ICT sector: The mediating role of collaborative innovation capability,” International Journal of EEntrepreneurship and Innovation (IJEEI), vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–23, 2022.

[31] M. N. Mata, J. M. Martins, and P. L. In´acio, “Collaborative innovation and absorptive capacity as an antecedent on IT firm financial performance,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 6339–6361, 2024.

[32] M. Friman, L. E. Olsson, and L. Thorin, “Collaborative capacity as an institutionalized practice for sustainable travel,” Case Studies on Transport Policy, vol. 11, pp. 1–8, 2023.

[33] N. Stojˇci´c, “Collaborative innovation in emerging innovation systems: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe,” The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 531–562, 2021.

[34] J. I. Palacios-Osma and A. Abuchar-Porras, “Open innovation factors for higher education institutions,” AiBi Revista de Investigaci´on, Administraci ´on e Ingenier´ıa, vol. 8, no. S1, pp. 225–233, 2020.

[35] B. Bigliardi, G. Ferraro, S. Filippelli, and F. Galati, “The influence of open innovation on firm performance,” International Journal of Engineering Business Management, vol. 12, pp. 1–14, 2020.

[36] D. Jovanovi´c, “Quality management in higher education institutions: From proclaimed to real developmental state,” Facta Universitatis, Series: Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 019–032, 2023.

[37] R. B. Hussein, A. M. A. Qader, and R. T. A. Rahman, “Measuring the quality of higher education using linear programming applied study in the Faculty of Management and Economics University of Mosul,” College of Basic Education Research Journal, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 818–836, 2022.

[38] L. Kukharska, “Quality of educational service in Ukrainian higher education institutions: Challenge-result paradigm,” in III International Scientific and Practical Conference, 2022, pp. 142–146.

[39] M. Al-Momani, “Methods of quality assurance in the performance of higher education institutions Jordanian theoretical study,” Journal Pendidikan Sosiologi dan Humaniora, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 467–477, 2022.

[40] M. Shukla, “Quality enhancement in higher education institutions,” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 806–809, 2023.

[41] Z. Lazi´c, A. DJordjevic, and A. Gazizulina, “Improvement of quality of higher education institutions as a basis for improvement of quality of life,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1–27, 2021.

[42] C. S. Sarrico, “Quality management, performance measurement and indicators in higher education institutions: Between burden, inspiration and innovation,” Quality in Higher Education, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 11–28, 2022.

[43] S. Sena, “Contemporary perspectives on higher education quality management,” in Quality management principles and policies in higher education. IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2020, pp. 38–60.

[44] J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publishing, 2022.

[45] SmartPLS, “SmartPLS 4.” [Online]. Available: https://www.smartpls.com

[46] J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” European Business Review, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–24, 2019.

[47] C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 18, no. 3, 1981.