Enhancing Cardiovascular Risk Stratification with Interpretable Ensemble Learning: A Comparative Analysis and Explainable AI-Driven Insights

Authors

  • Panji Arisaputra Bina Nusantara University
  • Pandu Wicaksono Bina Nusantara University
  • Karli Eka Setiawan Bina Nusantara University
  • Anindhita Dewabharata Bina Nusantara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/commit.v20i2.13355

Keywords:

Machine Learning, Ensemble Learning, Cardiovascular Disease Prediction, AdaBoost, Bagging, Explainable AI, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of global mortality, demanding accurate and interpretable risk stratification models for early intervention. However, the tradeoff between model performance and clinical interpretability remains a gap. Therefore, the research evaluates lightweight parametric ensemble models against complex black-box alternatives. A comparative analysis of Logistic Regression (LR) and Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB) is conducted using a publicly available dataset of 1,000 patient records, enhanced with Bagging and AdaBoost ensemble methods. The data undergo standardized preprocessing to mitigate bias, and a fivefold stratified cross-validation protocol ensures model generalizability. The Bagging LR ensemble achieves the best predictive performance, with a mean accuracy of 0.966 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): [0.958, 0.974]) and a Receiver Operating Characteristic-Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.993 (95% CI: [0.990, 0.996]), highly competitive with state-of-the-art baselines including LightGBM and CatBoost. These results show that computationally efficient and interpretable ensembles provide a viable alternative to more complex models, particularly in data-constrained clinical settings. A comprehensive Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) analysis using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) identifies clinically congruent drivers of prediction, the slope of the peak exercise ST segment, ST depression, and chest pain type. The findings highlight the potential of interpretable ensemble learning to develop dependable, deployable clinical decision support tools for integration into hospital or e-health systems for early CVD risk stratification. Further validation on larger, more diverse datasets is recommended to confirm broader clinical applicability.

Dimensions

Author Biographies

Panji Arisaputra, Bina Nusantara University

Computer Science Department, School of Computer Science

Pandu Wicaksono, Bina Nusantara University

Computer Science Department, School of Computer Science

Karli Eka Setiawan, Bina Nusantara University

Computer Science Department, School of Computer Science

Anindhita Dewabharata, Bina Nusantara University

Information Systems Department, School of Information Systems

References

[1] T. Adam et al., “The state of cardiac rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia: Barriers, facilitators, and policy implications,” Cureus, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1–11, 2023.

[2] K. E. Setiawan, A. Kurniawan, A. Chowanda, and D. Suhartono, “Clustering models for hospitals in Jakarta using Fuzzy C-Means and K-Means,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 216, pp. 356–363, 2023.

[3] P. Wicaksono, P. Samuel, I. N. Alam, and S. M. Isa, “Dealing with imbalanced sleep apnea data using DCGAN,” Traitement du Signal, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1527–1536, 2022.

[4] Y. Q. Cai et al., “Pitfalls in developing machine learning models for predicting cardiovascular diseases: Challenge and solutions,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 26, pp. 1–21, 2024.

[5] S. Ouf and A. I. B. ElSeddawy, “A proposed paradigm for intelligent heart disease prediction system using data mining techniques,” Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 220–240, 2021.

[6] S. P. Praveen et al., “Enhanced feature selection and ensemble learning for cardiovascular disease prediction: Hybrid GOL2-2 T and adaptive boosted decision fusion with babysitting refinement,” Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 11, pp. 1–18, 2024.

[7] D. Asif, M. Bibi, M. S. Arif, and A. Mukheimer, “Enhancing heart disease prediction through ensemble learning techniques with hyperparameter optimization,” Algorithms, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1– 17, 2023.

[8] S. J. Lee et al., “Deep learning improves prediction of cardiovascular disease-related mortality and admission in patients with hypertension: Analysis of the Korean National Health Information Database,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 11, no. 22, pp. 1–12, 2022.

[9] A. Ogunpola, F. Saeed, S. Basurra, A. M. Albarrak, and S. N. Qasem, “Machine learning-based predictive models for detection of cardiovascular diseases,” Diagnostics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2024.

[10] M. M. Yaqoob, M. Nazir, M. A. Khan, S. Qureshi, and A. Al-Rasheed, “Hybrid classifier-based federated learning in health service providers for cardiovascular disease prediction,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–17, 2023.

[11] X. Gao, S. Alam, P. Shi, F. Dexter, and N. Kong, “Interpretable machine learning models for hospital readmission prediction: A two-step extracted regression tree approach,” BMC medical informatics and decision making, vol. 23, pp. 1–11, 2023.

[12] D. Y. Omkari and S. B. Shinde, “Opportunities and challenges of machine learning and deep learning techniques in cardiovascular disease prediction: A systematic review,” Journal of Biological Systems, vol. 31, no. 02, pp. 309–344, 2023.

[13] M. A. Naser, A. A. Majeed, M. Alsabah, T. R. Al-Shaikhli, and K. M. Kaky, “A review of machine learning’s role in cardiovascular disease prediction: recent advances and future challenges,” Algorithms, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1–33, 2024.

[14] P. Aryawibowo, A. F. Hidayanto, Y. M. Toemali, K. E. Setiawan, and A. A. S. Gunawan, “Intelligent monitoring and diagnosing capability in healthcare: Systematic literature review,” in 2023 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech). Malang, Indonesia: IEEE, Aug. 24–25, 2023, pp. 627–632.

[15] R. Katarya and S. K. Meena, “Machine learning techniques for heart disease prediction: A comparative study and analysis,” Health and Technology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 87–97, 2021.

[16] A. Eleyan and E. Alboghbaish, “Electrocardiogram signals classification using deep-learningbased incorporated convolutional neural network and long short-term memory framework,” Computers, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2024.

[17] S. Xian et al., “Transformer patient embedding using electronic health records enables patient stratification and progression analysis,” npj Digital Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2025.

[18] J. Dumlao, “Cardiovascular disease dataset,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/jocelyndumlao/cardiovascular-disease-dataset

[19] G. Ngo, R. Beard, and R. Chandra, “Evolutionary bagging for ensemble learning,” Neurocomputing, vol. 510, pp. 1–14, 2022.

[20] H. Jain, A. Khunteta, and S. Srivastava, “Churn prediction in telecommunication using logistic regression and logit boost,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 167, pp. 101–112, 2020.

[21] V. Vangara, S. P. Vangara, and K. Thirupathur, “Opinion mining classification using naive bayes algorithm,” International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 495–498, 2020.

[22] S. Gonz´alez, S. Garc´ıa, J. Del Ser, L. Rokach, and F. Herrera, “A practical tutorial on bagging and boosting based ensembles for machine learning: Algorithms, software tools, performance study, practical perspectives and opportunities,” Information Fusion, vol. 64, pp. 205–237, 2020.

[23] P. P. Pande, “Special issue on benchmarking machine learning systems and applications,” IEEE Design & Test, vol. 39, no. 3, 2022.

[24] S. A. Hicks and Others, “On evaluation metrics for medical applications of artificial intelligence,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, pp. 1–9, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-05

How to Cite

[1]
P. Arisaputra, P. Wicaksono, K. Eka Setiawan, and A. Dewabharata, “Enhancing Cardiovascular Risk Stratification with Interpretable Ensemble Learning: A Comparative Analysis and Explainable AI-Driven Insights”, CommIT (Communication and Information Technology) Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 283–296, Aug. 2026.
Abstract 10  .
PDF downloaded 15  .