2006 Yogyakarta Synthetic Time History Response Spectrum versus SNI 1726:2019: Building Response

Authors

  • Abdul Rozaq Islamic University of Indonesia
  • Jafar Jafar Islamic University of Indonesia
  • Elvis Saputra Islamic University of Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/emacsjournal.v8i2.16476

Keywords:

2006 Yogyakarta earthquake, Synthetic time history, Response spectrum, Fundamental period, SNI 1726:2019

Abstract

This study investigates how a response spectrum derived from a synthetic acceleration time history representing the 2006 Yogyakarta earthquake compares with the SNI 1726:2019 design spectrum and influences the seismic response of a five-story reinforced concrete building. A 5%-damped event-based spectrum was developed through linear-acceleration analysis of single-degree-of-freedom systems and applied alongside the SNI spectrum to a three-dimensional ETABS model for Site Class SD. The developed spectrum reached a peak pseudo spectral acceleration of 1.011 g at 0.34 s, exceeding the SNI plateau of 0.78 g (0.155–0.777 s) by 29.62%. At the building's fundamental period of 1.086 s in X, the developed and SNI spectra gave 0.58 g and 0.56 g, a difference of 3.51%. At 1.385 s in Y, they gave 0.32 g and 0.44 g, a difference of 31.58%. The corresponding differences in unscaled base shear, elastic roof displacement, maximum inter-story drift, and P-Delta stability coefficients were small in X (2.28–3.05%) but greater in Y (27.35–31.34%), where SNI generally produced higher demands. Force scaling brought all cases to 2961.020 kN, although story-level force distributions remained different. All drift and stability checks met the adopted limits. These findings indicate that period-dependent spectral differences are reflected in structural responses but remain specific to the synthetic input and building examined. Further studies using additional ground motions and different building configurations are recommended.

Dimensions

Author Biographies

Abdul Rozaq, Islamic University of Indonesia

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Design Innovation

Jafar Jafar, Islamic University of Indonesia

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Design Innovation

Elvis Saputra, Islamic University of Indonesia

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Design Innovation

References

Amreen, S. & Budlani, D. (2019). Seismic Analysis Of Regular and Irregular Building by Time History Method and Response Spectrum Analysis. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 6 (5):2164-2167. https://www.irjet.net/archives/V6/i5/IRJET-V6I5417.pdf

Center for Volcanology and Geological Hazard Mitigation (PVMBG). (2022). ATLAS of Indonesian Local Site Conditions (Vs30) Based on Engineering Geomorphological Classification. Geological Agency –Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM). Bandung.

Diambama, A.D., et al. (2018). Velocity Structure of The Earthquake Zone of The M6.3 Yogyakarta Earthquake 2006 From a Seismic Tomography Study. Geophysical Journal International. 216 (1):439-452. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy430

Hu, Y., et al. (2021). Site-Specific Response Spectra: Guidelines for Engineering Practice. CivilEng. 2 (3):712-735. https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng2030039

Khatiwada, P. et al. (2023). Dynamic Modal Analyses of Building Structures Employing Site-Specific Response Spectra Versus Code Response Spectrum Models. CivilEng. 4 (1):134-150.https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng4010009

Kristiyanto M. et al. (2022). Development of Elastic Earthquake Response Spectra for Mamuju as Recommended Response Spectra for Buildings in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia. 7 (2):2929-2942. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i2.6363

National Standardization Agency (SNI). (2019). Indonesia National Standard 1726:2019 Regarding Procedures for Seismic-Resistant Design of Building and Non-Building Structures. SNI. Jakarta.

National Standardization Agency (SNI). (2019). Indonesia National Standard 2847:2019 About Structural Concrete Requirements for Buildings and Explanations. SNI. Jakarta.

National Standardization Agency (SNI). (2020). Indonesia National Standard 1727:2020 About Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. SNI. Jakarta.

Pawirodikromo, W. (2014). Engineering Characteristics of The 2006 Yogyakarta Earthquake Ground Motions And Its Implication on The Inelastic Response Of RC Structure. Procedia Engineering 95. (2014):54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.165

Pawirodikromo, W. (2017). Dynamic Analysis Structure. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rifaldy, I., et al. (2025). Development of Response Spectra from the 2018 Palu Earthquake Time-History Data. Rekayasa Sipil. 14 (1):54-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.22441/jrs.2025.v14.i1.06

Sutiono, A. et al. (2018). Opak Fault: A Comparative Review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 11-12 Oktober 2018, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. 212 (1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/212/1/012049

Sutjipto, S. dan Sumeru, I. (2022). Seismic Design Load Comparison of Reinforced Concrete Special Moment Frame and Dual Systems Based on SNI 1726:2019. Proceedings of the Second International Conference of Construction, Infrastructure, and Materials. 26 Juli 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia. 216 : 231-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-167949-0_20

Suwito. (2024). Development of a Response Spectrum Curve Application Using OpenSees and Python. Journal of Architecture Innovation. 7 (2):105-116. https://doi.org/10.36766/aij.v7i2.409

Ulza, A., et al. (2025). Analisis Respons Spektrum: State-Of-The-Art dan Pengembangan Kerangka Pemrograman Untuk Komputasi. Jurnal Teknik Sipil. 14 (1):23-32. https://doi.org/10.24815/jts.v14i1.44764

United States Geological Survey (USGS). nd. M 6.3-10 km E of Pundong, Indonesia. URL: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usp000ej1c/executive. Accessed at 11 August 2026.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-29

How to Cite

Rozaq, A., Jafar, J., & Saputra, E. (2026). 2006 Yogyakarta Synthetic Time History Response Spectrum versus SNI 1726:2019: Building Response. Engineering, MAthematics and Computer Science Journal (EMACS), 8(2), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.21512/emacsjournal.v8i2.16476

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract 21  .
PDF downloaded 0  .