How to Develop Learning Styles to Encourage Gen Zers in Their Academic Performance and Workforce
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/becossjournal.v4i2.8378Keywords:
Learning Style, Academic Performance, Technological Tools, Generation ZAbstract
The research aimed to find out the support of information communication and technology (ICT) to encourage generation Z (Gen Zers) in their learning style in academic environment as well as a preparation for their competences to enter the workforce. The research applied a qualitative method with literature study style. The studied literature consisted of primary sources such as articles, scientific papers, and the secondary sources, such as books, and some other internet sources. The literatures were comprehended by reading, understanding, analyzing, and synthesizing them to produce new findings in the form of information from various studied sources. Data analysis was done by using content analysis method by selecting, comparing, and combining various information so that the relevant knowledge was found to clarify the learning style needed by generation Z. The results indicate that generation Z learners like to use social media in the learning process and to interact with friends and teachers. In a higher education context, technological tools are utilised for online learning. The combination of digital tools in teaching-learning process and a suitable materials for generation Z learners is also important as it will engage students in the learning process. In entering the future workforce, generation Z learners are equipped with knowledge, skills, and competencies in English to support them in finding jobs locally and regionally.
Plum Analytics
References
Alalwan, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alfarraj, O., Alzahrani, A., Yahaya, N., & Al-Rahmi, A. M. (2019). Integrated three theories to develop a model of factors affecting students’ academic performance in higher education. IEEE Access, 7, 98725–98742. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928142
Anggraeni, C. W. (2018). Promoting Education 4.0 in English for Survival Class: What are the Challenges? Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 2(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v2i1.676
Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1).
Ayçiçek, B., & Yelken, T. Y. (2018). The effect of flipped classroom model on students’ classroom engagement in teaching english. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11226a
Aziz, N., Hashim, H., & Yunus, M. Md. (2019). Using Social Media to Enhance ESL Writing Skill among Gen-Z Learners. Creative Education, 10(12), 3020–3027. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012226
Beltrán-Martín, I. (2019). Using Padlet for collaborative learning. https://doi.org/10.4995/head19.2019.9188
Budiman, T., & Franky, F. (2021). The Relationship Pattern of Internet Usage Frequency, Generation Z Characteristics, and Teaching Method in the Millennium Era. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(18). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i18.24555
Cilliers, E. J. (2017). The Challenge of Teaching Generation Z. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.31.188198
Corporan, R. A., Joo-Nagata, J., Martín García, A. V., & Martín, A. H. (2020). Perception of teachers on collaborative tools knowledge level mediated by ict and their experience with students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(11), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V15I11.13121
Cuong, V. T., & Le, Q. H. (2020). Determining characteristics of teachers, students and educational managers in the 4.0 educational context. Vietnam Journal of Education, 4(4), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje/2020.75
Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/
Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2007). How to Teach English with Technology. Pearson Education.
Fesol, S. F. A., Salam, S., Osman, M., Bakar, N., & Salim, F. (2016). Learning style approaches for gen Y: An assessment conducted in a Malaysian technical university. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 24(4).
Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip Your Classroom to Improve Student Learning. Learning and Leading with Technology, 39, 12–17.
Giunta, C. (2017). An Emerging Awareness of Generation Z Students for Higher Education Professors. Archives of Business Research, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.54.2962
Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A Measure of College Student Course Engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 98(3). https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192
Hariharasudan, A., & Kot, S. (2018). A scoping review on Digital English and Education 4.0 for Industry 4.0. Social Sciences, 7(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7110227
https://genhq.com. (2020). Generational Breakdwon: Info about All of Generations. https://genhq.com/faq-info-about-generations/
Jain, A. ( I. I. of M. I. (2016). Don’t teach me, Let me learn! millenial learning. Volume 8 Issue 1 January—June 2016. Indore Management Journal, 8(1), 60.
Kamel, S. (2015). Electronic Commerce Challenges and Opportunities for Emerging Economies: Case of Egypt. CONF-IRM.
Kaya, A., & Balta, N. (2016). Taking Advantages of Technologies: Using the Socrative in English Language Teaching Classes. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 2(3).
Kharbach, M. (2016). 9 Fundamental Digital Skills for 21st Century Teachers. Educational Technology and Mobile Learning. https://www.educatorstechnology.com/2016/12/9-fundamental-digital-skills-for-21st.html.
Klimova, B. (2019). Impact of mobile learning on students’ achievement results. Education Sciences, 9(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020090
Krippendorf, K. (2013). Methodology, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its. International Encyclopedia of Communication.
Lemeshchenko-Lagoda, V., Kryvonos, I., & Kolodii, O. (2020). Integration of information and communication technologies into the process of learning the course of English for specific purposes as one of the requirements for sustainable future development. E3S Web of Conferences, 166. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016610005
Lestari, P. Y., & Kurniawan, E. H. (2018). Padlet as Media to Improve Writing Mastery of English Department Students of Uniska 2015-2016. ENGLISH FRANCA : Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v2i1.373
Little, D., & Dublin, T. C. (2020). Language learner autonomy: What, why and how? https://eventos.enallt.unam.mx/ilac2021/assets/presentaciones/DavidLittle-ILA-LASIG-webinar30.06.20.pdf
Loveland, E. (2017). Instant Generation. Journal of College Admission, 235, 34–38.
Maesaroh, M., Faridi, A., & Bharati, D. A. L. (2020). The Effectiveness of Socrative and Kahoot to Teach Grammar to Students with Different Interest. English Education Journal, 10(1).
Mendoza, J. (2018). Https://learnsafe.com/using-kahoot-in-the-classroom/. RecroPharma. https://learnsafe.com/using-kahoot-in-the-classroom/
Obradovic, V., Mitrovic, Z., & Pavicevic, M. (2017). Millennials vs. Baby Boomers in project management: Education and training gap. Proceedings of the 12th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies, CSIT 2017, 2. https://doi.org/10.1109/STC-CSIT.2017.8099422
Pearson. (2018). Beyond millennials: The next generation of learners. Global Research & Insights, August, 1–21.
Poláková, P., & Klímová, B. (2019). Mobile technology and generation Z in the English language classroom – A preliminary study. Education Sciences, 9(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030203
Putri, M. R. (2020). Reflection on Technology-Enhanced Learning in Research Based Teaching Method Implementation. Humaniora, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v11i1.6363
Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Loaiza-Aguirre, M. I., Zúñiga-Ojeda, A., & Portuguez-Castro, M. (2021). Characterization of the teaching profile within the framework of education 4.0. Future Internet, 13(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13040091
Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 19, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(July), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Suhendi, A., Purwarno, P., & Chairani, S. (2021). Constructivism-Based Teaching and Learning in Indonesian Education. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i4.8668
Wang, B.-T. (2017). Designing Mobile Apps for English Vocabulary Learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(4), 279–283. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.4.881
Yaman, İ., Şenel, M., & Yeşilel, D. B. A. (2015). Exploring the extent to which ELT students utilise smartphones for language learning purposes. South African Journal of Education, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v35n4a1198
Zakime, A. (n.d.). What-is-padlet. 16 September 2017. Retrieved March 10, 2021, from https://www.whatiselt.com/single-post/2017/09/15/what-is-padlet
Zhi, Q., & Su, M. (2016). Enhance Collaborative Learning by Visualizing Process of Knowledge Building with Padlet. Proceedings - 2015 International Conference of Educational Innovation Through Technology, EITT 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2015.54
ПЕЧЕНІЗЬКА (Губарєва), С., & ЗАВАЛЬНА, О. (2020). Disadvantages of traditional teaching foreign languages to modern students of Generation Z. EUROPEAN HUMANITIES STUDIES: State and Society, 1, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.38014/ehs-ss.2020.1.08
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Business Economic, Communication, and Social Sciences (BECOSS) Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
1.png)
