Pengaruh Religiusitas, Agreeableness, dan Usia Terhadap Perilaku Prososial Remaja
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/becossjournal.v3i3.7777Keywords:
Prosocial Behavior, Religiosity, Agreeableness, AgeAbstract
This study aims to examine the effect of religiosity, agreeableness, and age on adolescence’s prosocial behavior. This study selected the sample of 296 student, using a purposive sampling technique. The data collection used modification scale of Prosocialness Scale, Muslim Daily Religiosity Assessment Scale (MUDRAS), and International Personality Item Pool-Big Five Factors Model-50 (IPIP-BFM-50). Multiple regression and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were performed to analyze the data. The finding showed there is a significant influence of religiosity, agreeableness, and age on prosocial behavior.
Plum Analytics
References
Azhari. (2019). Peran pondok pesantren dalam menanggulangi kenakalan remaja. Al-Bahtsu, 4(1), 42–54.
Caprara, G. V., Kanacri, B. P. L., Gerbino, M., Zuffianò, A., Alessandri, G., Vecchio, G., Caprara, E., Pastorelli, C., & Bridglall, B. (2014). Positive effects of promoting prosocial behavior in early adolescence: Evidence from a school-based interventio. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(4), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414531464
Caprara, G. V., Steca, P., Zelli, A., & Capanna, C. (2005). A New scale for measuring adults’ prosocialnes. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.77
Clark, C. M., Dahlen, E. R., & Nicholson, B. C. (2015). The role of parenting in relational aggression and prosocial behavior among emerging adults. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 24(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.1002653
Einolf, C. J. (2013). Daily spiritual experiences and prosocial behavior. Social Indicators Research, 110(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9917-3
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Prosocial Development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science (7th editio, pp. 1–47). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01132.x
French, D. C., Eisenberg, N., Sallquist, J., Purwono, U., Lu, T., & Christ, S. (2013). Parent-adolescent relationships, religiosity, and the social adjustment of indonesian muslim adolescents. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(3), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032858
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of makers of the big-five factor structure. Psyhological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42.
Gotowiec, S., & van Mastrigt, S. (2019). Having versus doing: The roles of moral identity internalization and symbolization for prosocial behaviors. Journal of Social Psychology, 159(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1454394
Guo, Q., Sun, P., Cai, M., Zhang, X., & Song, K. (2019). Why are smarter individuals more prosocial? A study on the mediating roles of empathy and moral identity. Intelligence, 75(July), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.02.006
Güroglu, B., Bos, W. van den, & Crone, E. A. (2014). Sharing and giving across adolescence: An experimental study examining the development of prosocial behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(APR), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00291
Hardy, S. A., & Carlo, G. (2011). Moral identity: What is it, how does it develop, and is it linked to moral action? Child Development Perspectives, 5(3), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00189.x
Hipson, W. E., & Séguin, D. G. (2015). Is good fit related to good behaviour? Goodness of fit between daycare teacher-child relationships, temperament, and prosocial behaviour. Early Child Development and Care, 186(5), 785–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1061518
Istianah. (2015). Shalat sebagai perjalanan ruhani menuju Allah. Esoterik, 1(1), 47–64.
Kaur, S. (2020). Effect of religiosity and moral identity internalization on prosocial behaviour. Journal of Human Values, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685820901402
Lai, F. H. Y., Siu, A. M. H., & Shek, D. T. L. (2015). Individual and social predictors of prosocial behavior among chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 3(May), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2015.00039
Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2002). Measuring perceived social support: development of the child and adolescent social support scale (CASSS). Psychology in the Schools, 39(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10004
Malonda, E., Llorca, A., Mesurado, B., Samper, P., & Vicenta Mestre, M. (2019). Parents or peers? Predictors of prosocial behavior and aggression: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(OCT), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02379
Martin-Raugh, M. P., Kell, H. J., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2016). Prosocial knowledge mediates effect of agreeableness and emotional intelligence on prosocial behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.0
McKenna, E. F. (2000). Business Psychology and Organisational Behaviour: A Student’s Handbook (3rd editio). Psychology Press.
Najib, Mu. A. (2018). Konsep dan implementasi pembinaan religiusitas siswa di SMA. Jurnal Tawadhu, 2(2), 556–571.
Olufadi, Y. (2017). Muslim daily religiosity assessment scale (MUDRAS): A new instrument for muslim religiosity research and practice. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000074
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Fraser, A. M., Black, B. B., & Bean, R. A. (2015). Associations between friendship, sympathy, and prosocial behavior toward friends. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12108
Rahajeng, U. W., & Wigati, T. Y. A. (2018). Perilaku prososial sebagai prediktor status teman sebaya pada remaja. Jurnal Psikologi Teori Dan Terapan, 8(2), 124. https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v8n2.p124-132
Reich, W. A., Sangiorgio, C., & Young, J. (2019). Self-role integration: A person-specific predictor of life satisfaction and prosocial behavior. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 153(6), 649–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2019.1590297
Riska, H. A., Krisnatuti, D., & Yuliati, L. N. (2018). Pengaruh interaksi remaja dengan keluarga dan teman serta self-esteem terhadap perilaku prososial remaja awal. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga Dan Konsumen, 11(3), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.24156/jikk.2018.11.3.206
Santrock, J. W. (2007). Educational Psychology. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Van der Graaff, J., Carlo, G., Crocetti, E., Koot, H. M., & Branje, S. (2018). Prosocial behavior in adolescence: Gender differences in development and links with empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5), 1086–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0786-1
Van Hoorn, J., van Dijk, E., Meuwese, R., Rieffe, C., & Crone, E. A. (2016). Peer influence on prosocial behavior in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12173
Wentzel, K. (2015). Prosocial behaviour and schooling. Encyclopedia of Early Childhood Development, 1–5.
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 BUSINESS ECONOMIC, COMMUNICATION, AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (BECOSS) JOURNAL
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
1.png)
