Promoting SDG 16 Through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Reforms: Strengthening Administrative Justice in Lagos State Public Sector

Abstract

The administration of justice in Lagos State, Nigeria has been faced with numerous challenges, including congested court dockets, delayed justice, and high cost of litigation. These challenges have necessitated the need to explore alternative means of dispute resolution. This study evaluates the promotion of SDG 16 through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) reforms in strengthening administrative justice in Lagos state public sector. The central research question guiding this study is: To what extent have ADR mechanisms been effectively applied in resolving administrative matters in Lagos State, and what institutional, capacity, and technological factors shape their effectiveness? The study employed the interpretivism philosophy and a qualitative approach in data collection and analysis. An exploratory research design was considered appropriate because of its flexibility to consider many different aspects of the phenomenon. Similarly, newspaper reports and opinions were content analysed as the study adhered to the qualitative model of social research. The study indicates that ADR has been effective in resolving administrative matters in Lagos State, particularly in areas such as tenancy disputes, consumer protection, and small claims. By promoting a culture of peaceful resolution of disputes, ADR has contributed to the growth and development of Lagos State and Nigeria as a whole. The study recommends increased public awareness campaigns on the benefits of ADR, the creation of a dedicated ADR center within the Lagos State Judiciary, and the establishment of a legal framework that recognizes and regulates ADR processes. The paper also suggests the need for continued training and education for ADR practitioners to ensure the effective delivery of ADR services.