Numerical Simulation Study using the Explicit Finite Difference Method for Petroleum Reservoir

Authors

  • Sri Feni Maulindani Universitas Trisakti
  • Andry Prima Universitas Trisakti
  • Jati Arie Wibowo Universitas Pertamina
  • Pauhesti Rusdi Universitas Trisakti
  • Harin Widiyatni Universitas Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v16i2.12191

Keywords:

Numerical simulation, diffusivity equation, explicit finite difference method

Abstract

The behavior of petroleum reservoirs is inherently complex, making it challenging to determine their performance for both single-fluid and multiphase production systems. To accurately estimate the recovery reserves of a reservoir, a comprehensive understanding of its geometry and internal flow characteristics is essential. Numerical simulation serves as a fundamental tool for reservoir engineers, offering an efficient and reliable method to predict reservoir mechanisms, evaluate pressure variations, and estimate in-place hydrocarbon yield. This study employs mathematical modeling concepts and numerical techniques to analyze the dynamic behavior of petroleum reservoir systems. A flow model based on Partial Differential Equations (PDEs), specifically the diffusivity equation for unsteady-state fluid flow in porous media, is developed and applied. The diffusivity equation is discretized and solved mathematically using the explicit finite difference method to approximate pressure distribution over time and space. The primary objective of this research is to investigate and analyze the pressure distribution that governs reservoir performance under varying conditions. Sensitivity analyses are conducted to evaluate the influence of grid spacing, time step, hydraulic diffusivity, and boundary conditions on pressure reservoir behavior within a Cartesian grid for a one-dimensional, single-phase reservoir. The findings are expected to provide insight into the relationship between reservoir properties and fluid dynamics, supporting improved prediction of reservoir behavior. Ultimately, this research contributes to the optimization of petroleum production strategies and enhances the understanding of reservoir engineering processes through quantitative simulation.

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

References

Abou-Kassem, J. H., Islam, M. R., & Farouq Ali, S. M. (2020). Chapter 4 - Simulation with a block-centered grid. In J. H. Abou-Kassem, M. R. Islam, & S. M. Farouq Ali (Eds.), Petroleum Reservoir Simulation (Second Edition) (Second Edi, pp. 65–124). Gulf Professional Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819150-7.00004-9

Adak, M. (2020). Comparison of explicit and implicit finite difference schemes on diffusion equation. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, 320, 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3615-1_15

Aliyu, B. K., Agency, D., Olatoyinbo, S. F., Agency, D., & Vehicle, U. A. (2021). Explicit and Implicit Solution to 2D Heat Equation. February. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10788.19840

Appau, P. O., Dankwa, O. K., & Brantson, E. T. (2019). A comparative study between finite difference explicit and implicit method for predicting pressure distribution in a petroleum reservoir. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 11(4), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijest.v11i4.3

Contreras, F. R. L., Carvalho, D. K. E., Galindez-Ramirez, G., & Lyra, P. R. M. (2021). A nonlinear finite volume method coupled with a modified higher order MUSCL-type method for the numerical simulation of two-phase flows in non-homogeneous and non-isotropic oil reservoirs. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 92, 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2021.03.023

Galindez-Ramirez, G., Contreras, F. R. L., Carvalho, D. K. E., & Lyra, P. R. M. (2020). Numerical simulation of two-phase flows in 2-D petroleum reservoirs using a very high-order CPR method coupled to the MPFA-D finite volume scheme. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 192, 107220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107220

Ghedira, A., Lataoui, Z., Benselama, A. M., Bertin, Y., & Jemni, A. (2025). Numerical simulation of incompressible two-phase flows with phase change process in porous media. Results in Engineering, 25, 103706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103706

Keita, S., Beljadid, A., & Bourgault, Y. (2021). Efficient second-order semi-implicit finite element method for fourth-order nonlinear diffusion equations. Computer Physics Communications, 258, 107588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107588

Kvashchuk, A., Klöfkorn, R., & Sandve, T. H. (2023). A second-order finite volume method for field-scale reservoir simulation. Transport in Porous Media, 150(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-023-01999-1

Liu, H., & Luo, Y. (2022). An explicit method to calculate implicit spatial finite differences. Geophysics, 87(2), T157–T168. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2021-0001.1

Maulindani, S. F., Abdassah, D., Marhaendrajana, & Prakoso, S. (2021). Reservoir simulation study for dual porosity model to determine characteristic of naturally fractured reservoir. 3rd International Conference on Earth Science, Mineral, and Energy, 2363, 020006. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0061130

Maulindani, S. F., Abdassah, D., Marhaendrajana, T., Prakoso, S., & Fathaddin, M. T. (2021). Application of pressure type curve matching for characterizing the naturally fractured reservoir. Journal of Earth Energy Science, Engineering, and Technology, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.25105/jeeset.v4i1.9060

Mojumder, M. S. H., Haque, M. N., & Alam, M. J. (2023). Efficient finite difference methods for the numerical analysis of one-dimensional heat equation. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 11(10), 3099–3123. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2023.1110204

Nascimento, J. C. S., Santos, A. dos, Pico Ortiz, C. E., & Pires, A. P. (2021). A fully implicit EOS based compositional two-phase transient flow simulator in wellbores. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 205(May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108923

Raza, Q., & Wang, X. (2024). Numerical simulation of Boger nanofluids with heat source, magnetic field, and Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model between two parallel permeable porous plates via finite difference method. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 64(May), 105518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2024.105518

Salomon, L., & Guilcher, P. M. (2024). Fully higher-order coupling of finite element and level set methods for two-phase flow with a new explicit projection method. Computers and Fluids, 275(February), 106245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2024.106245

Sun, Q., & Ertekin, T. (2019). Reservoir Simulation: Problems and Solutions. https://doi.org/10.2118/9781613996935

Sun, Q., Zhang, R., Zhan, Q., Member, S., & Liu, Q. H. (2019). 3-D implicit – explicit hybrid finite difference / spectral element / finite element time domain method. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 67(8), 5469–5476.

Wang, S., Yu, C., Sang, G., Yu, R., & Cheng, F. (2020). An oil – water two-phase reservoir numerical simulation coupled with dynamic capillary force based on the full-implicit method. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 79(9), 2527–2549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2019.11.013

Downloads

Published

2025-10-13

How to Cite

Maulindani, S. F., Prima, A., Wibowo, J. A., Rusdi, P., & Widiyatni, H. (2025). Numerical Simulation Study using the Explicit Finite Difference Method for Petroleum Reservoir. ComTech: Computer, Mathematics and Engineering Applications, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v16i2.12191
Abstract 24  .
PDF downloaded 12  .