Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Perilaku Belajar Mahasiswa E-Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v5i2.1027Keywords:
e-learning website, content curriculum, digital literacyAbstract
E-learning becomes one alternative for limited education infrastructure in Indonesia. So technological innovation website is used as one alternative content educational. So that the effectiveness of e-learning system should have constructivism approach when they use this system. This research aims to find variables that could influence e-learning students’ behavior when they use the system. Survey was conducted on e-learning students from Online Binus University and Indonesia Open University (UT).The result of the primary data was processedusing Wrapls 3.0 to process the structure equation model of the frame research. Ten hypotheses were proposed but only some hypotheses were valid. Variables such as motivation, digital literacy, and satisfaction affected directly to the attitude of understanding student learning, while the curriculum material product and interaction e-learning website did not influence the behavior of student e-learning attitude.
Plum Analytics
References
Al-Qeisi K . I. (2009). Analyzing the Use of UTAUT Model in Explaining an Online Behaviour:
Internet Banking Adoption. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy,
Department of Marketing and Branding. Brunel University.
Collier J. E. and Bienstock C. C. (2006). Measuring service quality in e-retailing. Journal of Service
Research, 8(3), 260–275. doi: 10.1177/1094670505278867.
Degeng, N. (2005). Paradigma membangun kewibawaan guru dalam pengembangan profesi di era
global. Seminar Nasional Universitas PGRI Adibuana, Madiun, 10 September 2005.
Eisenberg, M. (2008). Information literacy: essential skills for the information age. DESIDOC Journal
of Library & Information Technology, 28(2), 39–47.
Fornell, C., and Bookstein, F. (1982). A comparative analysis of two structural equation models:
LISREL and PLS applied to market data. Dalam In C. Fornell (Ed.)., A second generation of
multivariate analysis (hal. 289-394). New York: Praeger.
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In
C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives,
local designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Hair, J. F., et al. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis a Global Perspective. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Kim. (2005). The Effects on contructivist teaching approach on student academic achevement, selfconcept,
and learning strategies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(1), 7–19. doi:10.1007/bf03024963.
Kotler, P. and Keller, K. L. (2006). Marketing Management, 12th Ed. Singapore: Pearson International.
Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a Psychology of Being. New York: D. Van Nostrand Company.
McLeod, J. (2012). What do clients want from therapy? A practice-friendly review of research into
client preferences. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 14(1), 19–32.
Morgan, R. M. and Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship Marketing.
Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for
assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213–233.
Poon, J. (2013). Blended Learning: an institutional approach for enhancing students' learning
experiences. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2).
The World Bank, (2013, 16 Desember). Indonesia Economic Quarterly: Slower growth; high risks.
Diakses dari http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2013/12/16/indonesia-economic
quarterly-december-2013
Turban, D.B. & Cable, D.M. (2003). Firm reputation and applicant pool characteristics. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 24(6), 733–751.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation,
and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information System Research, 11(4),
–365.
Wiek. (2008, 12 September). Plastik Tipis untuk Baca eBook. Diakses dari
http://tekno.kompas.com/read/2008/09/12/11511970/Plastik.Tipis.untuk.Baca.eBook.
Williams, N. A., Bland, W., & Christie, G. (2008). Improving student achievement and satisfaction by
adopting a blended learning approach to inorganic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research
and Practice, 9(1), 43–50. doi:10.1039/B801290N
Yen, J. C. & Lee, C.Y. (2011). Exploring problem solving patterns and their impact on learning
achievement in a blended learning environment. Computers & Education, 56(1), 138–145.
doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.012
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License - Share Alike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
USER RIGHTS
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA)
